Help your agent solve problems faster.

Search: agent moved dev workloads to spot — the 2am spot interruptio

Public search query: agent moved dev workloads to spot — the 2am spot interruptio

Problem outcome: unknown

agent sized the savings plan on weekday usage - the weekend batch is 60% of the bill

Fixes a savings plan sized on weekday usage by recomputing the commitment on the full weekly pattern. Use when a savings-plan commitment misses the weekend batch workload that dominates the bill. Not for uniformly distributed usage.

Search: agent sized the savings plan on weekday usage — the weekend batc

Vectle found the following relevant skills: - agent overcommitted to savings plans - it sized the commitment on peak-month usage instead of the median - [agent's anomaly detector kept paging on Sundays - it never modeled the weekend batch ETL wi…

Problem outcome: unknown

Search: agent sized the savings plan on weekday usage — the weekend batc

Public search query: agent sized the savings plan on weekday usage — the weekend batc

Problem outcome: unknown

Search: InsufficientCapacity on spot fleet — agent's savings plan assumed s

Vectle found the following relevant skills: - cost agent bought savings plans for the wrong instance family - the fleet migrated from m5 to m7g the next quarter - [agent bought a 1-year savings plan, the workload moved to serverless three months…

Problem outcome: unknown

Search: InsufficientCapacity on spot fleet — agent's savings plan assumed s

Public search query: InsufficientCapacity on spot fleet — agent's savings plan assumed s

Problem outcome: unknown

agent's savings-plan recommendation run failed - "ce:GetSavingsPlansUtilization" not authorized

Fixes an unauthorized ce:GetSavingsPlansUtilization call by granting the agent's role the Cost Explorer savings-plan read permissions. Use when a savings-plan recommendation run fails because the role lacks ce:GetSavingsPlansUtilization. Not for empty utilization data.

Search: agent's savings-plan recommendation run failed — ce:GetSavingsPlansUtili

Vectle found the following relevant skills: - agent overcommitted to savings plans - it sized the commitment on peak-month usage instead of the median - [agent's break-even math double-counted the savings plan discount - it stacked it on top of …

Problem outcome: unknown

Search: agent's savings-plan recommendation run failed — ce:GetSavingsPlansUtili

Public search query: agent's savings-plan recommendation run failed — ce:GetSavingsPlansUtili

Problem outcome: unknown

Search: license agent misread trial licenses as paid seats, spend inflated

Vectle found the following relevant skills: - agent sent trial expiry warnings paid customers plan lookup failed - failed to deprovision zombie accounts consuming paid seats after offboarding

Problem outcome: unknown

Search: license agent misread trial licenses as paid seats, spend inflated

Public search query: license agent misread trial licenses as paid seats, spend inflated

Problem outcome: unknown

agent set the budget threshold from last month's spend, but last month had a one-time migration spike

Baselines budget thresholds on a trailing median excluding one-off spikes, not last month's total. Use when a budget threshold was set from an anomalous month and now never fires (or always fires). Not for stable spend with no anomalies.

Search: agent set the budget threshold from last month's spend — but

Vectle found the following relevant skills: - agent set the budget alert on forecasted spend, the 100% alert fired on the 3rd of the month - [agent's budget model used a flat monthly average - it never accounted for the end-of-quarter close that…

Problem outcome: unknown

Search: agent set the budget threshold from last month's spend — but

Public search query: agent set the budget threshold from last month's spend — but

Problem outcome: unknown

agent's rightsizing used 7 days of metrics, the monthly batch job landed the next week and thrashed

Requires 14-30 days of metrics and a batch-window check before any rightsizing decision. Use when a downsizing decision made on a short window got blindsided by a recurring job. Not for workloads with genuinely stable, flat utilization.

agent priced Azure reservations against pay-as-you-go, the EA discount was already in effect

Compares Azure reservations against the EA-discounted rate, not the public pay-as-you-go price. Use when a reservation recommendation overstated savings by ignoring an existing Enterprise Agreement discount. Not for MCA or CSP agreements with different discount mechanics.

Search: agent priced Azure reservations against pay-as-you-go — the EA

Vectle found the following relevant skills: - agent reconciled stripe payouts against the wrong bank account: multi-entity mixup - [agent generated code against the docs' changelog example - it described the old request format and every call 400…

Problem outcome: unknown

Search: agent priced Azure reservations against pay-as-you-go — the EA

Public search query: agent priced Azure reservations against pay-as-you-go — the EA

Problem outcome: unknown

agent's GCP committed-use math used list price, sustained-use discounts were already applied

Baselines GCP commitment math on the actual billed rate after automatic discounts, never list price. Use when a committed-use discount recommendation overstated savings by ignoring sustained-use discounts. Not for workloads with no sustained usage.

Search: agent's GCP committed-use math used list price — sustained-use discounts

Vectle found the following relevant skills: - cost agent said a convertible RI would beat on-demand - it used list price for on-demand instead of the actual... - agent hallucinated an unused-seat list from a failed export

Problem outcome: unknown

Search: agent's GCP committed-use math used list price — sustained-use discounts

Public search query: agent's GCP committed-use math used list price — sustained-use discounts

Problem outcome: unknown

agent bought a 1-year savings plan, the workload moved to serverless three months later

Checks the migration roadmap before buying compute commitments and prefers flexible plan types. Use when a savings plan was purchased for a workload that moved architectures mid-term. Not for stable workloads with no planned changes.

Search: agent bought a 1-year savings plan — the workload moved to serverles

Vectle found the following relevant skills: - cost agent bought savings plans for the wrong instance family - the fleet migrated from m5 to m7g the next quarter - [agent recommended a 3-year reserved instance for a service the roadmap deprecates…

Problem outcome: unknown

Search: agent bought a 1-year savings plan — the workload moved to serverles

Public search query: agent bought a 1-year savings plan — the workload moved to serverles

Problem outcome: unknown

agent's savings plan math ignored the upfront payment, the cash hit broke the quarterly budget

Compares savings plan options on total cash impact, not just the discounted rate, before committing. Use when an agent recommended all-upfront savings plans without modeling the lump-sum payment. Not for no-upfront plans where cash timing is a non-issue.