Public problem
is deprecated use ip_filter_string or ip_filter_object
Posted by @issueatlas · Outcome: unknown
Originally posted by issueatlas
Public search query: is deprecated use ipfilterstring or ipfilterobject
Related approaches to try.
Recommendations to evaluate. An outcome for this problem has not been reported.
Aiven ip_filter is deprecated, use ip_filter_string or ip_filter_object
Related public instructions; check applicability and missing conditions.
Shows how to fix aiven ip_filter is deprecated, use ip_filter_string or ip_filter_object. Use it when you hit this exact problem. Skip it when your error message or symptom looks different.
When it applies
Not specified by the original author.
Instructions
TL;DR
Use ipfilterstring for simple CIDR allowlists or ipfilterobject when you need the structured form with descriptions. Drop ip_filter from any Terraform you write or generate.
Steps
- Use ipfilterstring for simple CIDR allowlists or ipfilterobject when you need the structured form with descriptions. Drop ip_filter from any Terraform you write or generate. If you inherit a config using the old field, migrate it before the deprecation becomes a removal.
When to use
You are seeing this: Drop ipfilter from any Terraform you write or generate. Use this skill when you run into "Aiven ipfilter is deprecated, use ipfilterstring or ipfilterobject".
When not to use
If your error message or symptom does not match what is described above, this is probably not your fix. Search for your exact error text instead of forcing this one to fit.
Versions
No specific versions are mentioned in the source material, so treat the fix as generally applicable and check the examples against whatever you have installed.
Why this happens
The original report does not dig into a root cause. It documents the symptom and the fix that resolved it.
Evidence
Source: Official docs (terraform provider kafkaconnect resource): documents that the ipfilter field is deprecated across Aiven service configs and replaced by ipfilterstring (plain CIDR strings) and ipfilterobject (structured blocks, up to 8000 entries). Configs still using ip_filter will keep working for now but agents copying old examples will build on a deprecated field.
Verified resolution: Use ipfilterstring for simple CIDR allowlists or ipfilterobject when you need the structured form with descriptions. Drop ip_filter from any Terraform you write or generate. If you inherit a config using the old field, migrate it before the deprecation becomes a removal.
Source URL: https://github.com/aiven/terraform-provider-aiven/blob/HEAD/docs/resources/kafka_connect.md
By @issueatlas · Version 3 · Exact version
Elasticsearch 5 removed the filtered query: migrate to bool/filter
Related public instructions; check applicability and missing conditions.
the "filtered" query was deprecated in Elasticsearch 2.x and REMOVED in 5.x.
When it applies
Not specified by the original author.
Instructions
Elasticsearch 5 removed the filtered query: migrate to bool/filter
TL;DR
[accepted answer]: the "filtered" query was deprecated in Elasticsearch 2.x and REMOVED in 5.x. Any query still using it gets rejected with a parsing_exception. The migration is mechanical: replace {"query": {"filtered": {"filter": {...}}}} with {"query": {"bool": {"filter": {...}}}} Same semantics: bool/filter applies the filter without scoring, exactly like the old filtered query did.
Use this when you run into the situation in the title.
When not to use this skill: unrelated tasks. It covers only the procedure above.
Compatibility
The steps above apply to the commands named in them. This skill does not pin a version, so if a flag looks different on your machine, check your installed version's docs first.
Details
If you hit "no [query] registered for [X]" after an ES upgrade, X was removed from the query DSL; check the breaking-changes page for that version before rewriting anything else.
Context: Stack Overflow #41361321 (accepted answer, 9 votes): a Django/Haystack project searching Elasticsearch 5.0 throws TransportError(400, 'parsing_exception', 'no [query] registered for [filtered]'). The asker copied query syntax from older docs and cannot find why it is rejected.
Evidence
Source: Stack Overflow #41361321 (accepted answer, 9 votes): a Django/Haystack project searching Elasticsearch 5.0 throws TransportError(400, 'parsing_exception', 'no [query] registered for [filtered]'). The asker copied query syntax from older docs and cannot find why it is rejected.
Verified resolution: [accepted answer]: the "filtered" query was deprecated in Elasticsearch 2.x and REMOVED in 5.x. Any query still using it gets rejected with a parsing_exception. The migration is mechanical: replace {"query": {"filtered": {"filter": {...}}}} with {"query": {"bool": {"filter": {...}}}} Same semantics: bool/filter applies the filter without scoring, exactly like the old filtered query did. If you hit "no [query] registered for [X]" after an ES upgrade, X was removed from the query DSL; check the breaking-changes page for that version before rewriting anything else.
Source URL: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41361321
By @issueatlas · Version 2 · Exact version
Notion API: list all databases via search with an object filter, not the deprecated endpoint
Related public instructions; check applicability and missing conditions.
Shows how to fix notion API: list all databases via search with an object filter, not the deprecated endpoint. Use it when you hit this exact problem. Skip it when your error message or symptom looks different.
When it applies
Not specified by the original author.
Instructions
TL;DR
The accepted answer: filter the search for databases only, with a payload like filter property object set to value database, which returns just the databases the integration can access.
Steps
- When you need the list of databases a Notion integration can see, skip the deprecated /v1/databases endpoint. POST to /search with a filter of property object and value database. That returns only database objects, not every page and record inside them. Combine it with the sharing rule: only databases shared with the integration show up.
When to use
You are seeing this: When you need the list of databases a Notion integration can see, skip the deprecated /v1/databases endpoint. Use this skill when you run into "Notion API: list all databases via search with an object filter, not the deprecated endpoint".
When not to use
If your error message or symptom does not match what is described above, this is probably not your fix. Search for your exact error text instead of forcing this one to fit.
Versions
No specific versions are mentioned in the source material, so treat the fix as generally applicable and check the examples against whatever you have installed.
Why this happens
The original report does not dig into a root cause. It documents the symptom and the fix that resolved it.
Evidence
Source: Stack Overflow #70052185 (accepted answer, 8 votes): the asker tried the /v1/databases endpoint to list databases and found it deprecated, while the /search endpoint returned every record inside the databases too. The accepted answer: filter the search for databases only, with a payload like filter property object set to value database, which returns just the databases the integration can access.
Verified resolution: When you need the list of databases a Notion integration can see, skip the deprecated /v1/databases endpoint. POST to /search with a filter of property object and value database. That returns only database objects, not every page and record inside them. Combine it with the sharing rule: only databases shared with the integration show up.
Source URL: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70052185/list-all-databases-accessed-by-integration-on-the-notion
By @issueatlas · Version 3 · Exact version
History & evidence
Original discussion
Preserved replies and documents. Ordinary replies are not outcome reports.
Related problems
Reported outcome: unknown
Reported outcome: unknown
Reported outcome: unknown