agent hallucinated a fivetran connector id that does not exist, sync ch

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Connector ids in Fivetran are opaque generated strings, and an agent asked for one it does not actually know will often produce a confident, well formatted, nonexistent id. Any call with it then fails with a not found style error that looks like a Fivetran problem. List the connectors in the group through the API, match by the connector name and service you intended, and use only an id returned by that list. Never let the agent proceed on an id from memory or from a naming guess.

agent hallucinated a fivetran connector id that does not exist, sync check failed

Use this when

• A sync status check fails saying the connector does not exist or is not found.
• The connector id in the agent's config or message was never copied from the Fivetran UI or an API response.
• The named connector clearly exists in the dashboard under a similar name.

Not for this skill when

• The id came from an API list response and the connector was since deleted. Recreate or repoint deliberately.
• The call fails on authentication. A valid id with a bad credential fails differently; check the error wording.

Steps

1. Capture the failing call: the connector id used, the group it was sent to, and the exact error. Note whether the error is not found versus unauthorised. Verify: the failure is classified before any new id is trusted
2. List connectors for the group through the Fivetran API and search the result by service and schema name for the connector you meant. Note the real id from the response. Verify: the id now comes from the system of record
3. Compare the real id with the invented one and check every place the invented value was written: agent config, a runbook, a ticket, a script default. Note each place to correct. Verify: the bad value is hunted down everywhere it spread
4. Replace it, rerun the sync check, and confirm Fivetran returns the connector state for the real connector. Note the state and the last sync time it reports. Verify: the check works against the real connector
5. Change the workflow so ids are always resolved at run time: the agent lists connectors, matches on name, and refuses to call a per connector endpoint with an unresolved id. Note the guard in the procedure. Verify: an invented id can no longer reach the API

Variant phrasings

fivetran connector not found api wrong connector id

The plain API error phrasing.

fivetran list connectors api get connector id by name

The resolution method searched directly.

Compatibility: Fivetran REST API, connector and group resources. Applies to any agent or script that addresses Fivetran objects by id.

Why it happens

Generated ids are the worst case for a language model: they carry no meaning to memorise, their format is easy to imitate, and a request that names one confidently gives no signal that it was fabricated. The system on the other end cannot help either, because a nonexistent id and a typo look the same to it. Grounding has to happen by construction: resolve names to ids through list endpoints in the same run, and treat any id that did not come from a tool response in this session as unverified.

Edge cases / pitfalls

• Two connectors can share a service and a similar schema name in one group. Match on more than the first hit: destination, schema, and creation context.
• An id copied from a different Fivetran account or a test group is real but wrong. The group is part of the identity, check both.
• Screenshots and old tickets are common sources of stale ids after a connector is recreated. Prefer a live list over any document.
• If an agent wrote the invented id into a shared config, assume other automations picked it up. Search the repo and the runbooks, not just the failing job.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_B70YSrgtPGWh496BIZAbbQ

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_B70YSrgtPGWh496BIZAbbQ

Thread query: agent hallucinated a fivetran connector id that does not exist, sync check failed

TL;DR: Connector ids in Fivetran are opaque generated strings, and an agent asked for one it does not actually know will often produce a confident, well formatted, nonexistent id. Any call with it then fails with a not found style error that looks like a Fivetran problem. List the connectors in the group through the API, match by the connector name and service you intended, and use only an id returned by that list. Never let the agent proceed on an id from memory or from a naming guess.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

The agent compared the last sync time against the wrong expectation: the connector's schedule, its pause state, or its typical duration. Read the connector's configured schedule and pause state first, then judge the last sync against that. A sync that ran six hours ago on a daily schedule is healthy, not failed.

agent mis-read fivetran sync schedule and flagged a failed sync

Use this when

• An agent flags a Fivetran sync as failed when it is healthy.
• The agent assumed a frequency the connector does not have.
• Paused connectors get flagged as broken.

Not for this skill when

• The sync genuinely failed. Read the sync error.
• The schedule itself is wrong. Fix the schedule.

Steps

1. Read the connector's configured sync frequency and pause state. Note the expected cadence. Verify: the expectation is grounded
2. Compare the last successful sync time against the cadence, allowing normal variance. Note the comparison. Verify: healthy versus late is decided fairly
3. Fix the agent's check: schedule-aware, pause-aware, variance-tolerant. Note the new logic. Verify: the check reads reality
4. Add test cases: paused connector, daily cadence, recent success. Note the tests. Verify: the cases are pinned
5. Verify the agent stays quiet on a healthy connector. Note the silence. Verify: the false alarm is gone

Variant phrasings

fivetran sync schedule check

The monitoring-shaped search.

fivetran paused connector monitoring

The pause-shaped phrasing.

Compatibility: Fivetran dashboard and API for schedule and sync history. Agent check logic is yours to write.

Why it happens

Monitoring without schedule context is just anxiety: every connector has its own cadence, and paused is a valid state, not a failure. Agents that hardcode hourly expectations flag daily connectors as broken every day. The schedule is part of the connector's definition of healthy, so the check must read it. False alarms are expensive twice: they wake people up, and they train people to ignore the monitor, which is how a real failure later goes unnoticed.

Edge cases / pitfalls

• Frequency changes take effect on the next cycle. A check run during the transition sees a confusing gap; allow for it.
• Manual syncs between scheduled ones reset the last-sync clock. The check should consider any successful sync, not just scheduled ones.
• Connectors blocked on setup or schema approval are neither paused nor healthy. Classify blocked as its own state.
• Timezone differences between the agent and the dashboard can shift the comparison by hours. Compare in UTC.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstyJTAtMCBxvghyxGYhNUfg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstyJTAtMCBxvghyxGYhNUfg

Thread query: agent mis-read fivetran sync schedule and flagged a failed sync

TL;DR: The agent compared the last sync time against the wrong expectation: the connector's schedule, its pause state, or its typical duration. Read the connector's configured schedule and pause state first, then judge the last sync against that. A sync that ran six hours ago on a daily schedule is healthy, not failed.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in DSR inventory agent by acting on the exact problem first: correct the request record to show that system as not searched, create a manual task for it assigned to its owner, and require a search log or export as evidence before any system can be marked searched in future. Do not rerun the whole job or request unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one request, system or batch first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

agent hallucinated system inventory - claimed SaaS tool searched that has no connector

Use this when

• The operation in DSR inventory agent fails with this exact message or symptom: agent hallucinated system inventory - claimed SaaS tool searched that has no connector.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A privacy request, export, deletion or deadline is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is an outage notice from the platform. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a legal interpretation or a policy choice. That is a privacy team decision, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in DSR inventory agent, and copy the full message plus the request, system or record involved into the run notes. Verify: the problem is reproduced on demand with a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: correct the request record to show that system as not searched, create a manual task for it assigned to its owner, and require a search log or export as evidence before any system can be marked searched in future. Verify: the smallest failing scope now completes, or the named request, system or record behaves as the fix predicts.
3. Check the neighbouring requests, systems or records that share the same connector, mapping or owner, because this class of failure rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in DSR inventory agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
5. Compare the result counts or status against the source in DSR inventory agent so a silent partial success is caught before the request is closed. Verify: counts match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the request so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

An agent completing an inventory from the data map alone marks planned coverage as actual coverage, hiding a system that still holds the requester data untouched.

Variant phrasings

agent hallucinated system inventory - claimed SaaS tool searched that has no connector

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, queue or request tracker. Treat it identically: same fix, same single scope proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinated system inventory claimed SaaS tool searched that has no connector

The how to phrasing for the same failure in DSR inventory agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

DSR inventory agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Edge cases

• If the fix works on the small scope but the full rerun still fails on a different system, treat that system as a new instance, record its scope separately, and apply the same steps rather than widening the first fix blindly.
• If personal data was already sent to the wrong place or a notice was already sent early, record the incident for privacy assessment first, then apply the fix, and note the affected request in the run record.
• If a legal hold or a verification question is in play, pause deletion or delivery for that request only, resolve the hold or verification, and keep other requests moving.

Compatibility: DSR inventory agent at current versions, plus the admin console or API the query names; no extra tooling beyond the source system access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_RS8rgTHgxdJxiLcW1bnQZA

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_RS8rgTHgxdJxiLcW1bnQZA

Thread query: agent hallucinated system inventory claimed SaaS tool searched that has no connector

TL;DR: Fix this in DSR inventory agent by acting on the exact problem first: correct the request record to show that system as not searched, create a manual task for it assigned to its owner, and require a search log or export as evidence before any system can be marked searched in future. Do not rerun the whole job or request unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one request, system or batch first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.