FIELD_CUSTOM_VALIDATION_EXCEPTION salesforce error

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

A validation rule on the object evaluated to true and rejected your data; the message text usually quotes the rule's own error text. Match that text to the rule in Setup, check which fields it inspects, then fix the data or narrow the rule. Never blanket-disable the rule to unblock a load.

Error

[ {
  "message" : "Close Date must be in the current fiscal year",
  "errorCode" : "FIELD_CUSTOM_VALIDATION_EXCEPTION",
  "fields" : [ "CloseDate" ]
} ]

Steps

1. Copy the exact message text from the error. Expected: you have the rule's custom error message verbatim.
2. In Setup, go to Object Manager, pick the object, then Validation Rules, and search for that message text. Expected: you land on the single rule that fired.
3. Read the rule formula and the fields array from the error to see which fields it checks. Expected: you know the condition, for example CloseDate before today.
4. Fix the data URIs correct the offending field values in your load file or agent payload. Expected: the same record saves cleanly.
5. If the data is legitimately correct (for example backfilling historical closes), ask the admin to scope the rule (exclude the integration user profile or add a bypass checkbox), not to delete it. Expected: loads pass while interactive users keep the guardrail.

When to use

• Any insert, update, or upsert fails with FIELDCUSTOMVALIDATION_EXCEPTION.
• An agent's write-back worked for months and started failing after a new rule was deployed.
• Data Loader shows row-level failures with custom message text.

When not to use

• "required field missing" errors (missing data, not a rule).
• Trigger errors (CANNOTINSERTUPDATEACTIVATEENTITY).
• The message is blank, which points at a flow or process builder fault instead.

Tool compatibility

• Salesforce REST, SOAP, and Bulk APIs; validation rules on standard and custom objects.
• Data Loader, ETL tools, and agent write-back jobs.

Variant phrasings

Validation rule blocking legitimate updates

Same error from the admin side; the fix is scoping the rule, not deleting it.

FIELDCUSTOMVALIDATION_EXCEPTION with empty fields array

The rule fires on a formula or cross-object reference; read the rule formula directly.

Why it happens

Validation rules run before triggers on every write. They cannot tell an agent bulk load from a human typo, so a rule written for interactive entry often rejects legitimate programmatic data shapes.

Edge cases

• Rules referencing related objects (account fields from opportunity) fail when the related record changes, not when your record changes.
• Date rules using TODAY() behave differently across timezones; an agent in UTC can trip a rule written for Pacific business hours.
• Deactivating a rule to unblock a load and forgetting to reactivate it is the classic incident; use a scoped bypass instead.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_N8ApIIKrQA6mduh6FoXyGw

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_N8ApIIKrQA6mduh6FoXyGw

Thread query: "FIELDCUSTOMVALIDATION_EXCEPTION" salesforce error

TL;DR: A validation rule on the object evaluated to true and rejected your data; the message text usually quotes the rule's own error text. Match that text to the rule in Setup, check which fields it inspects, then fix the data or narrow the rule. Never blanket-disable the rule to unblock a load.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

A lookup filter on the field rejects the value. Check the field's lookup filter criteria and pick a value that passes it.

Error

FIELD_FILTER_VALIDATION_EXCEPTION

Steps

1. Open the field's lookup filter definition Expected: you see the criteria.
2. Check your value against the filter Expected: you find the mismatch.
3. Pick a lookup value that satisfies the filter Expected: it passes.
4. Re-run the operation Expected: it succeeds.

When to use

• FIELDFILTERVALIDATION_EXCEPTION
• A lookup filter rejects the value

When not to use

• No lookup filter exists (then check validation rules)
• The filter is wrong (then fix the filter, not the data)

Tool compatibility

• Salesforce lookup filters
• Data loads with lookups

Variant phrasings

field filter validation exception

The lookup filter rejects your value. Check its criteria.

FIELDFILTERVALIDATION_EXCEPTION

Same: the value fails the field's lookup filter.

Why it happens

Lookup filters are invisible in the API; agents see a valid ID and cannot understand why it is rejected.

Edge cases

• Filters can depend on the source record's field values
• Optional vs required filter behavior differs

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_CoPiKgrAKeXWQb6k0LYHrg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_CoPiKgrAKeXWQb6k0LYHrg

Thread query: "FIELDFILTERVALIDATION_EXCEPTION" salesforce error

TL;DR: A lookup filter on the field rejects the value. Check the field's lookup filter criteria and pick a value that passes it.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in the Salesforce validation rule by acting on the exact message first: read the validation rule named in the error for that object, populate the dependent field it requires on the enriched records or correct the value that breaks it, and rerun the update on one lead first - do not disable the rule. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one record, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Salesforce enrichment error "FIELD_CUSTOM_VALIDATION_EXCEPTION" update failed failure

Use this when

• The operation in the Salesforce validation rule fails with this exact message: Salesforce enrichment error "FIELDCUSTOMVALIDATION_EXCEPTION" update failed failure.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A run, import, export or alert is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is a permission or platform outage notice. Resolve that first, then return here if this error remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with its output. That is a quality review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in the Salesforce validation rule, and copy the full message plus the record, account or list involved into the run notes. Verify: the error is reproduced on demand with a named record, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this error: read the validation rule named in the error for that object, populate the dependent field it requires on the enriched records or correct the value that breaks it, and rerun the update on one lead first - do not disable the rule. Verify: one named record now completes end to end with the correct result and the original message does not appear.
3. Check the neighbouring records that share the same source, mapping, workspace or settings, because this class of failure rarely affects only one record. Verify: the neighbouring records are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Compare the result counts, fields or alerts against the source in the Salesforce validation rule so a silent partial success is caught before sign off. Verify: counts match the source or every difference is named and explained.
5. Rerun the original operation in the Salesforce validation rule on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the error, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

Enrichment updates a field that a CRM validation rule protects with conditions on other fields, which the enrichment payload does not satisfy.

Variant phrasings

Salesforce enrichment error "FIELDCUSTOMVALIDATION_EXCEPTION" update failed failure

The verbatim form searchers paste from the terminal or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single record proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix this failure in the Salesforce validation rule

The how-to phrasing for the same failure. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

Troubleshooting this failure in the Salesforce validation rule

The symptom-first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Compatibility: the Salesforce validation rule at current versions, plus the platform API or console the query names; no extra tooling beyond the source system access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstHDNv7CyB5jGepUsLQWA

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstHDNv7CyB5jGepUsLQWA

Thread query: Salesforce enrichment error "FIELDCUSTOMVALIDATION_EXCEPTION" update failed failure

TL;DR: Fix this in the Salesforce validation rule by acting on the exact message first: read the validation rule named in the error for that object, populate the dependent field it requires on the enriched records or correct the value that breaks it, and rerun the update on one lead first - do not disable the rule. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one record, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.