agent hallucinating figures not in source data for verify vendor banking det

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in banking verification agent by acting on the exact problem first: compare the account and routing numbers the agent submits against the numbers extracted from the bank letter digit by digit, fail the verification attempt when any digit differs, and never let the agent correct a number from memory or from a previous vendor record. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

agent hallucinating figures not in source data for verify vendor banking details for payment setup

Use this when

• The operation in banking verification agent fails with this exact problem: agent hallucinating figures not in source data for verify vendor banking details for payment setup.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A vendor onboarding, payment setup, screening or vendor record step is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor of the tool. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a commercial decision such as price or terms. That is a negotiation, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named vendor in banking verification agent and record the full problem text plus the vendor, supplier record or onboarding case involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: compare the account and routing numbers the agent submits against the numbers extracted from the bank letter digit by digit, fail the verification attempt when any digit differs, and never let the agent correct a number from memory or from a previous vendor record. Verify: the single failing vendor now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring vendors, supplier records or onboarding cases that share the same automation, template or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one vendor. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in banking verification agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the vendor master record, the signed tax form or the compliance document, so a silent partial success is caught. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the vendor record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent hallucinating figures not in source data for verify vendor banking details for payment setup

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, report or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single vendor proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinating figures not in source data for verify vendor banking details for payment setup error hallucination failure

The how to phrasing for the same failure in banking verification agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

banking verification agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

Banking numbers have no pattern an agent can safely reconstruct, so a single invented or transposed digit produces a confident looking submission that fails at the bank or worse pays the wrong account.

Edge cases

• The vendor was merged, renamed or given new banking details after the failing run started. Refresh the vendor state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single vendor proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other vendors. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared automation can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct value. The vendor master record governs identity and payment details, the signed tax document governs classification and withholding, and the compliance screening governs approval status; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: banking verification agent at current versions, plus the procurement, ERP or screening platform the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_NFOYkL5vZNyixR6nBknqpw

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_NFOYkL5vZNyixR6nBknqpw

Thread query: agent hallucinating figures not in source data for verify vendor banking details for payment setup error hallucination failure

TL;DR: Fix this in banking verification agent by acting on the exact problem first: compare the account and routing numbers the agent submits against the numbers extracted from the bank letter digit by digit, fail the verification attempt when any digit differs, and never let the agent correct a number from memory or from a previous vendor record. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in Coupa onboarding agent by acting on the exact problem first: require every figure and date in the onboarding to come from a retrieved source, the W-9 for tax details, the bank letter for account numbers and the agreement for terms, add a check that compares each loaded value against its source document, and remove any loaded value that has no matching source before submitting the supplier. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

agent hallucinating figures not in source data for onboard a new supplier in Coupa

Use this when

• The operation in Coupa onboarding agent fails with this exact problem: agent hallucinating figures not in source data for onboard a new supplier in Coupa.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A vendor onboarding, payment setup, screening or vendor record step is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor of the tool. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a commercial decision such as price or terms. That is a negotiation, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named vendor in Coupa onboarding agent and record the full problem text plus the vendor, supplier record or onboarding case involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: require every figure and date in the onboarding to come from a retrieved source, the W-9 for tax details, the bank letter for account numbers and the agreement for terms, add a check that compares each loaded value against its source document, and remove any loaded value that has no matching source before submitting the supplier. Verify: the single failing vendor now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring vendors, supplier records or onboarding cases that share the same automation, template or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one vendor. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in Coupa onboarding agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the vendor master record, the signed tax form or the compliance document, so a silent partial success is caught. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the vendor record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent hallucinating figures not in source data for onboard a new supplier in Coupa

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, report or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single vendor proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinating figures not in source data for onboard a new supplier in Coupa error hallucination failure

The how to phrasing for the same failure in Coupa onboarding agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

Coupa onboarding agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

When a lookup or a parse returns empty, an agent can fill the gap with a plausible value, and only a field by field comparison against the source documents separates real supplier details from invented ones.

Edge cases

• The vendor was merged, renamed or given new banking details after the failing run started. Refresh the vendor state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single vendor proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other vendors. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared automation can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct value. The vendor master record governs identity and payment details, the signed tax document governs classification and withholding, and the compliance screening governs approval status; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: Coupa onboarding agent at current versions, plus the procurement, ERP or screening platform the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_8ydx-LfxeR3tLFSRVX27Sw

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_8ydx-LfxeR3tLFSRVX27Sw

Thread query: agent hallucinating figures not in source data for onboard a new supplier in Coupa error hallucination failure

TL;DR: Fix this in Coupa onboarding agent by acting on the exact problem first: require every figure and date in the onboarding to come from a retrieved source, the W-9 for tax details, the bank letter for account numbers and the agreement for terms, add a check that compares each loaded value against its source document, and remove any loaded value that has no matching source before submitting the supplier. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in ERP vendor creation agent by acting on the exact problem first: populate the vendor record only with values taken from the approved vendor request and its documents, add a read back check that compares the saved record field by field with that request, and correct or delete any saved value that does not appear in the request. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

agent hallucinating figures not in source data for create the vendor record in the ERP

Use this when

• The operation in ERP vendor creation agent fails with this exact problem: agent hallucinating figures not in source data for create the vendor record in the ERP.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A vendor onboarding, payment setup, screening or vendor record step is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor of the tool. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a commercial decision such as price or terms. That is a negotiation, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named vendor in ERP vendor creation agent and record the full problem text plus the vendor, supplier record or onboarding case involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: populate the vendor record only with values taken from the approved vendor request and its documents, add a read back check that compares the saved record field by field with that request, and correct or delete any saved value that does not appear in the request. Verify: the single failing vendor now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring vendors, supplier records or onboarding cases that share the same automation, template or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one vendor. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in ERP vendor creation agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the vendor master record, the signed tax form or the compliance document, so a silent partial success is caught. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the vendor record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent hallucinating figures not in source data for create the vendor record in the ERP

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, report or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single vendor proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinating figures not in source data for create the vendor record in the ERP error hallucination failure

The how to phrasing for the same failure in ERP vendor creation agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

ERP vendor creation agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

Creation forms with many empty fields invite an agent to complete them plausibly, and a read back comparison against the approved request is the check that catches invented terms, addresses or contacts.

Edge cases

• The vendor was merged, renamed or given new banking details after the failing run started. Refresh the vendor state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single vendor proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other vendors. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared automation can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct value. The vendor master record governs identity and payment details, the signed tax document governs classification and withholding, and the compliance screening governs approval status; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: ERP vendor creation agent at current versions, plus the procurement, ERP or screening platform the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_KPWfSscDE7Y1Zrx69z5FUw

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_KPWfSscDE7Y1Zrx69z5FUw

Thread query: agent hallucinating figures not in source data for create the vendor record in the ERP error hallucination failure

TL;DR: Fix this in ERP vendor creation agent by acting on the exact problem first: populate the vendor record only with values taken from the approved vendor request and its documents, add a read back check that compares the saved record field by field with that request, and correct or delete any saved value that does not appear in the request. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.