agent loop detected: repeatedly retrying verify vendor banking details for pa

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in banking verification agent by acting on the exact problem first: record each verification attempt with its result, stop after the service returns the same failure twice, and route the vendor to manual review with the bank letter attached rather than submitting the same banking details again. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

agent loop detected repeatedly retrying verify vendor banking details for payment setup

Use this when

• The operation in banking verification agent fails with this exact problem: agent loop detected repeatedly retrying verify vendor banking details for payment setup.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A vendor onboarding, payment setup, screening or vendor record step is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor of the tool. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a commercial decision such as price or terms. That is a negotiation, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named vendor in banking verification agent and record the full problem text plus the vendor, supplier record or onboarding case involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: record each verification attempt with its result, stop after the service returns the same failure twice, and route the vendor to manual review with the bank letter attached rather than submitting the same banking details again. Verify: the single failing vendor now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring vendors, supplier records or onboarding cases that share the same automation, template or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one vendor. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in banking verification agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the vendor master record, the signed tax form or the compliance document, so a silent partial success is caught. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the vendor record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent loop detected repeatedly retrying verify vendor banking details for payment setup

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, report or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single vendor proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent loop detected: repeatedly retrying verify vendor banking details for payment setup error failure loop

The how to phrasing for the same failure in banking verification agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

banking verification agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

Repeated identical submissions do not change a bank answer, they only risk locking the vendor out of the service, so a same result stop plus manual review is the safe exit.

Edge cases

• The vendor was merged, renamed or given new banking details after the failing run started. Refresh the vendor state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single vendor proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other vendors. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared automation can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct value. The vendor master record governs identity and payment details, the signed tax document governs classification and withholding, and the compliance screening governs approval status; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: banking verification agent at current versions, plus the procurement, ERP or screening platform the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstQ6KDUd9Y2fh4oEDO-qe2w

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstQ6KDUd9Y2fh4oEDO-qe2w

Thread query: agent loop detected: repeatedly retrying verify vendor banking details for payment setup error failure loop

TL;DR: Fix this in banking verification agent by acting on the exact problem first: record each verification attempt with its result, stop after the service returns the same failure twice, and route the vendor to manual review with the bank letter attached rather than submitting the same banking details again. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in banking verification agent by acting on the exact problem first: save the verification status returned for the vendor after the first check, add a stop rule that a pending status is a valid outcome to report rather than a reason to recheck immediately, space any further checks, and end the run with the vendor marked pending with its reference recorded. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

agent stuck loop detected repeating the same step while trying to verify vendor banking details for payment setup

Use this when

• The operation in banking verification agent fails with this exact problem: agent stuck loop detected repeating the same step while trying to verify vendor banking details for payment setup.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A vendor onboarding, payment setup, screening or vendor record step is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor of the tool. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a commercial decision such as price or terms. That is a negotiation, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named vendor in banking verification agent and record the full problem text plus the vendor, supplier record or onboarding case involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: save the verification status returned for the vendor after the first check, add a stop rule that a pending status is a valid outcome to report rather than a reason to recheck immediately, space any further checks, and end the run with the vendor marked pending with its reference recorded. Verify: the single failing vendor now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring vendors, supplier records or onboarding cases that share the same automation, template or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one vendor. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in banking verification agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the vendor master record, the signed tax form or the compliance document, so a silent partial success is caught. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the vendor record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent stuck loop detected repeating the same step while trying to verify vendor banking details for payment setup

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, report or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single vendor proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent stuck loop detected repeating the same step while trying to verify vendor banking details for payment setup error failure

The how to phrasing for the same failure in banking verification agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

banking verification agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

A pending verification looks unfinished to an agent with no pending state, so it rechecks in a tight loop, and naming pending as a recorded outcome is what ends the loop.

Edge cases

• The vendor was merged, renamed or given new banking details after the failing run started. Refresh the vendor state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single vendor proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other vendors. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared automation can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct value. The vendor master record governs identity and payment details, the signed tax document governs classification and withholding, and the compliance screening governs approval status; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: banking verification agent at current versions, plus the procurement, ERP or screening platform the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_hHv3sxlHPzm8qHmT2swXzA

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_hHv3sxlHPzm8qHmT2swXzA

Thread query: agent stuck loop detected repeating the same step while trying to verify vendor banking details for payment setup error failure

TL;DR: Fix this in banking verification agent by acting on the exact problem first: save the verification status returned for the vendor after the first check, add a stop rule that a pending status is a valid outcome to report rather than a reason to recheck immediately, space any further checks, and end the run with the vendor marked pending with its reference recorded. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in sanctions screening agent by acting on the exact problem first: dedupe screening retries by vendor tax ID and legal name, allow one active screening per vendor, and when a retry is requested return the existing screening status instead of submitting again, with the retry attempts logged. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

agent loop detected repeatedly retrying run sanctions screening on a new vendor

Use this when

• The operation in sanctions screening agent fails with this exact problem: agent loop detected repeatedly retrying run sanctions screening on a new vendor.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A vendor onboarding, payment setup, screening or vendor record step is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor of the tool. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a commercial decision such as price or terms. That is a negotiation, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named vendor in sanctions screening agent and record the full problem text plus the vendor, supplier record or onboarding case involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: dedupe screening retries by vendor tax ID and legal name, allow one active screening per vendor, and when a retry is requested return the existing screening status instead of submitting again, with the retry attempts logged. Verify: the single failing vendor now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring vendors, supplier records or onboarding cases that share the same automation, template or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one vendor. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in sanctions screening agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the vendor master record, the signed tax form or the compliance document, so a silent partial success is caught. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the vendor record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent loop detected repeatedly retrying run sanctions screening on a new vendor

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, report or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single vendor proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent loop detected: repeatedly retrying run sanctions screening on a new vendor error failure loop

The how to phrasing for the same failure in sanctions screening agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

sanctions screening agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

Each retry submits a fresh screening that resets the wait, so the result the agent is waiting for never arrives, and returning the existing status breaks the cycle.

Edge cases

• The vendor was merged, renamed or given new banking details after the failing run started. Refresh the vendor state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single vendor proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other vendors. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared automation can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct value. The vendor master record governs identity and payment details, the signed tax document governs classification and withholding, and the compliance screening governs approval status; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: sanctions screening agent at current versions, plus the procurement, ERP or screening platform the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_pA49wWIpBuJ2EU1i1cOQMw

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_pA49wWIpBuJ2EU1i1cOQMw

Thread query: agent loop detected: repeatedly retrying run sanctions screening on a new vendor error failure loop

TL;DR: Fix this in sanctions screening agent by acting on the exact problem first: dedupe screening retries by vendor tax ID and legal name, allow one active screening per vendor, and when a retry is requested return the existing screening status instead of submitting again, with the retry attempts logged. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.