agent hallucinating trust level not in source data for triage the mode

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in moderation queue triage agent by acting on the exact problem first: require every trust level the agent reports to come from a member record it just read, validate the value against the member record fields before any decision uses it, and reject the triage result for any report whose trust level cannot be traced to that record. Do not rerun the whole job or queue unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one post, thread, report or batch first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Agent hallucinating a trust level not in the source data during queue triage

Use this when

• The operation in moderation queue triage agent fails with this exact message or symptom: Agent hallucinating a trust level not in the source data during queue triage.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• Moderation, routing, auditing or a member facing community task is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is an outage notice from the platform. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a moderation judgment or content quality. That is a policy review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in moderation queue triage agent, and copy the full message plus the post, thread, report or member involved into the run notes. Verify: the problem is reproduced on demand with a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: require every trust level the agent reports to come from a member record it just read, validate the value against the member record fields before any decision uses it, and reject the triage result for any report whose trust level cannot be traced to that record. Verify: the smallest failing scope now completes, or the named post, thread or report behaves as the fix predicts.
3. Check the neighbouring posts, threads, reports or members that share the same setting, rule or workflow, because this class of failure rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in moderation queue triage agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
5. Compare the result counts or status against the source in moderation queue triage agent so a silent partial success is caught before sign off. Verify: counts match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the item so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

When the agent summarises members from memory instead of the record in front of it, it invents plausible trust levels that then drive wrong hold and approve decisions.

Variant phrasings

Agent hallucinating a trust level not in the source data during queue triage

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, queue or report. Treat it identically: same fix, same single scope proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinating trust level not in source data for triage the moderation queue error hallucination failure

The how to phrasing for the same failure in moderation queue triage agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

moderation queue triage agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Edge cases

• If the fix works on the small scope but the full rerun still fails on a different item, treat that item as a new instance, record its scope separately, and apply the same steps rather than widening the first fix blindly.
• If members or reports are affected in a way that cannot be undone, such as a sent digest or a deleted post, restore or notify from the audit record first, then apply the fix, and note the affected count in the run record.
• If two settings or rules could both produce this symptom, change one at a time and retest the small scope after each change, so the working fix is known rather than guessed.

Compatibility: moderation queue triage agent at current versions, plus the admin console, moderation queue or API the query names; no extra tooling beyond the source system access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstY2MDwtvpAIblItIIva2pw

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstY2MDwtvpAIblItIIva2pw

Thread query: agent hallucinating trust level not in source data for triage the moderation queue error hallucination failure

TL;DR: Fix this in moderation queue triage agent by acting on the exact problem first: require every trust level the agent reports to come from a member record it just read, validate the value against the member record fields before any decision uses it, and reject the triage result for any report whose trust level cannot be traced to that record. Do not rerun the whole job or queue unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one post, thread, report or batch first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in at-risk list agent workflow by acting on the exact message first: generate the list only from rows in the score export, include the source score and date for every listed account, and run a verification pass that drops any account whose score cannot be found in the export. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one account, batch or record set first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

agent hallucinating health score not in source data for generate an at-risk account list

Use this when

• The operation in at-risk list agent workflow fails with this exact message or symptom: agent hallucinating health score not in source data for generate an at-risk account list.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• Scoring, alerting or routing is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is an outage notice from the platform. Resolve that first, then return here if this error remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with its output quality. That is a quality review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in at-risk list agent workflow, and copy the full message plus the account, measure or job involved into the run notes. Verify: the error is reproduced on demand with a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this error: generate the list only from rows in the score export, include the source score and date for every listed account, and run a verification pass that drops any account whose score cannot be found in the export. Verify: the smallest failing scope now completes, or the named account, measure or job behaves as the fix predicts.
3. Check the neighbouring accounts, measures or jobs that share the same config, schema or credential, because this class of failure rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in at-risk list agent workflow on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
5. Compare the result counts, scores or status against the source in at-risk list agent workflow so a silent partial success is caught before sign off. Verify: counts match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the item so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the error, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

A list built partly from the agent expectations adds accounts that were never scored, and a source check on every row is what keeps the list trustworthy for CSMs.

Variant phrasings

agent hallucinating health score not in source data for generate an at-risk account list

The verbatim form searchers paste from the terminal or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single scope proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinating health score not in source data for generate an at-risk account list error hallucination failure

The how-to phrasing for the same failure in at-risk list agent workflow. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

at-risk list agent workflow troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom-first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Edge cases

• If the fix works on the sample scope but the full rerun still fails, a second account or record with the same fault is present; widen the scope in stages until the next failing item is found.
• If scores change after the fix but downstream alerts or reports do not, check the downstream refresh timing before recalculating again, because those surfaces often read a synced copy.
• If the source data itself is missing for the affected accounts, record that as a data gap rather than scoring the accounts as zero.

Compatibility: at-risk list agent workflow at current versions, plus the platform API or console the query names; no extra tooling beyond the source system access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_FthcFvU5CbsCo0-s52TYvQ

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_FthcFvU5CbsCo0-s52TYvQ

Thread query: agent hallucinating health score not in source data for generate an at-risk account list error hallucination failure

TL;DR: Fix this in at-risk list agent workflow by acting on the exact message first: generate the list only from rows in the score export, include the source score and date for every listed account, and run a verification pass that drops any account whose score cannot be found in the export. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one account, batch or record set first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this by acting on the exact problem first: require the agent to cite the exact source line, document or record for every answer it uses to score a new vendor from its security questionnaire, reject any answer with no source, and rerun the task checking each cited source against the original vendor data. Do not rerun the same operation unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one agent run for one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

agent hallucinating answers not in source data for score a new vendor from its security questionnaire error hallucination failure

Use this when

• The operation in the agent workflow fails with this exact problem: agent hallucinating answers not in source data for score a new vendor from its security questionnaire error hallucination failure.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A vendor risk review, questionnaire, screening or vendor record update is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a risk judgement or a tier decision. That is a risk owner decision, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named agent run for one vendor in the agent workflow and record the full problem text plus the vendor, record or report involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: require the agent to cite the exact source line, document or record for every answer it uses to score a new vendor from its security questionnaire, reject any answer with no source, and rerun the task checking each cited source against the original vendor data. Verify: the single failing agent run for one vendor now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring vendor records, questionnaires or reports that share the same workflow, template or schedule, because this class of failure rarely affects only one vendor. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in the agent workflow on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the vendor supplied document, the questionnaire response or the risk record, so a silent partial success is caught. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the vendor record or review log so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent hallucinating answers not in source data for score a new vendor from its security questionnaire error hallucination failure

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, report or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single scope proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinating answers not in source data for score a new vendor from its security questionnaire error hallucination failure

The how to phrasing for the same failure in the agent workflow. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

The agent workflow troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

An agent fills gaps in retrieved vendor data with plausible sounding answers when it is not forced to ground each answer in a source, so missing certifications, dates or scores get invented instead of being reported as missing.

Edge cases

• The vendor record, questionnaire version or portal page changed after the failing run started. Refresh the current state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single scope proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other vendors. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared workflow, template or schedule can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct value. The vendor supplied document governs what the vendor attested, the risk tool record governs the stored score or status, and the procurement record governs vendor identity and lifecycle status; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: The agent workflow at current versions, plus the vendor risk, procurement or source system the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_MnhuXUVK-s1VqmipL7vNtg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_MnhuXUVK-s1VqmipL7vNtg

Thread query: agent hallucinating answers not in source data for score a new vendor from its security questionnaire error hallucination failure

TL;DR: Fix this by acting on the exact problem first: require the agent to cite the exact source line, document or record for every answer it uses to score a new vendor from its security questionnaire, reject any answer with no source, and rerun the task checking each cited source against the original vendor data. Do not rerun the same operation unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one agent run for one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.