docs agent loop detected: repeatedly regenerating the same broken changelog en

Not specified by the original author.

docs agent loop detected: repeatedly regenerating the same broken changelog entry

TL;DR

Stop the loop, fix the single bad input that makes every attempt fail, then add a seen-this-output-before guard that aborts after repeats. The loop is a symptom: the generator keeps producing the same broken entry because the template or the source data is wrong, not because it needs more tries.

The error

docs agent loop detected: repeatedly regenerating the same broken changelog entry

Steps

1. Halt the agent and capture one full broken entry plus the exact input that produced it (the commit data and the template variables).

Expected: you have the entry text and its source data side by side.

2. Reproduce it once by hand. Run the generator on just that single input, outside the agent loop.

Expected: the same broken entry appears, which proves the input or template is at fault, not flakiness.

3. Fix the root cause. Usual culprits: a malformed template variable, a missing field in the commit data, or an unescaped character the renderer chokes on.

Expected: the single-run output is now well-formed.

4. Add a loop guard to the agent: hash each generated entry, keep the last few hashes, and abort after 3 repeats, surfacing the failing input instead of retrying.

Expected: future bad inputs stop fast with a clear error naming the input, instead of looping forever.

Use this when

• the agent regenerates the same changelog entry over and over
• a changelog job never finishes and the log shows identical attempts
• retry counts climb but the output never changes

Not for this skill when

• the changelog is wrong in a different way on each run (that is bad data, not a loop)
• the loop is in a different pipeline stage, like link fixing or doc generation
• the generator crashes instead of producing output (fix the crash)

Variant phrasings

changelog generator stuck in retry loop

Capture one attempt, reproduce by hand, fix the input, add the guard.

agent keeps rewriting same release notes entry

Check whether the retry is triggered by a validation step that will never pass on this input.

docs pipeline never finishes on one entry

Look for a missing template field first; that is the most common single-input failure.

Why it happens

There is no termination condition on unchanged output. The agent treats a deterministic failure as a transient one, so it retries forever. Every retry feeds the same broken input through the same broken template and gets the same broken entry.

Edge cases

• The guard hash must ignore timestamps and other volatile fields, or it will never match and the loop continues.
• Two different bad inputs can produce the same broken entry. Log the input hash alongside the output hash so the report names the real culprit.
• If the template itself is broken, every entry fails identically. Test the template on known-good input before blaming the data.
• A validation step that rewrites the entry before hashing can mask repeats. Hash the final output, not an intermediate form.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_VluAQz3N7jcr4IYGtWFgkg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_VluAQz3N7jcr4IYGtWFgkg

Thread query: docs agent loop detected: repeatedly regenerating the same broken changelog entry

TL;DR: Stop the loop, fix the single bad input that makes every attempt fail, then add a seen-this-output-before guard that aborts after repeats. The loop is a symptom: the generator keeps producing the same broken entry because the template or the source data is wrong, not because it needs more tries.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in Search check agent by acting on the exact symptom first: separate checking from fixing, record the translation issue once as a finding and return to checking the next query, and deduplicate findings by article and locale before any update work is queued. Do not repeat the same edit, search or run unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one article, collection or query first, then apply it across the affected scope and confirm as a reader.

Agent loop repeating the same translation update while checking search results

Use this when

• Work in Search check agent shows this exact symptom: Agent loop repeating the same translation update while checking search results.
• The same symptom repeats after a retry with unchanged inputs.
• Readers or support agents are blocked until this item is corrected.

Not for this skill when

• The help center platform itself is down or returning outage notices. Resolve that first, then return here if this symptom remains.
• The content is correct and you only want a style or tone rewrite. That is an editorial pass, not this fix.

Steps

1. Reproduce the symptom with the smallest scope that still shows it in Search check agent, and record the article, collection or query involved plus the exact wording from the code block above. Verify: the symptom is reproduced on demand with a named scope, not only reported second hand.
2. Apply the specific fix for this symptom: separate checking from fixing, record the translation issue once as a finding and return to checking the next query, and deduplicate findings by article and locale before any update work is queued. Verify: the smallest failing scope now behaves as the fix predicts, checked in the published view rather than only in the editor.
3. Check neighbouring articles, collections or locales that share the same template, category or workflow, because this class of problem rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Repeat the original reader or agent action in Search check agent that exposed the symptom, using the same query, link or workflow as the first attempt. Verify: the action completes and the original symptom does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth for this item, the current product behaviour, price list, release notes or ticket evidence named in the fix. Verify: the published result matches the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the scope it covered and the verification result where the content team works, so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the symptom, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

Agent loop repeating the same translation update while checking search results

The verbatim form readers and agents paste from the help center or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single scope proof, then the wider rollout.

How to fix - agent stuck loop detected repeating the same translation update while trying to check help center search results for an error query error failure

The how to phrasing for the same problem in Search check agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the final check.

Search check agent troubleshooting for this symptom

The symptom first phrasing used when the full message is hidden. Surface the full symptom first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

A checker that starts fixing mid check revisits the same article after every query it appears in, converting one translation fault into an endless update loop.

Edge cases

• The symptom appears in one locale, collection or audience view only. Fix that scope, then check the same item in the other views before closing.
• A cached or indexed copy keeps showing the old state after the fix. Allow for the platform reindex or cache window, recheck in a fresh reader session, and only then escalate.
• Two items have near identical titles. Confirm the identifier of the item you edited, not just its title, before declaring the fix verified.

Compatibility: Search check agent at current versions, plus the help center admin, search or API surface the query names; no extra tooling beyond reader level access to verify the published result.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_BtKJ9jw-Jk2-F748Xc2lTw

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_BtKJ9jw-Jk2-F748Xc2lTw

Thread query: agent stuck loop detected repeating the same translation update while trying to check help center search results for an error query error failure

TL;DR: Fix this in Search check agent by acting on the exact symptom first: separate checking from fixing, record the translation issue once as a finding and return to checking the next query, and deduplicate findings by article and locale before any update work is queued. Do not repeat the same edit, search or run unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one article, collection or query first, then apply it across the affected scope and confirm as a reader.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in Article update agent by acting on the exact symptom first: deduplicate the broken link list by target address, fix each unique link once, mark it verified in the saved list, and stop the run when the unverified count stops shrinking between passes. Do not repeat the same edit, search or run unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one article, collection or query first, then apply it across the affected scope and confirm as a reader.

Agent loop repeating the same broken link list while updating an article after a UI change

Use this when

• Work in Article update agent shows this exact symptom: Agent loop repeating the same broken link list while updating an article after a UI change.
• The same symptom repeats after a retry with unchanged inputs.
• Readers or support agents are blocked until this item is corrected.

Not for this skill when

• The help center platform itself is down or returning outage notices. Resolve that first, then return here if this symptom remains.
• The content is correct and you only want a style or tone rewrite. That is an editorial pass, not this fix.

Steps

1. Reproduce the symptom with the smallest scope that still shows it in Article update agent, and record the article, collection or query involved plus the exact wording from the code block above. Verify: the symptom is reproduced on demand with a named scope, not only reported second hand.
2. Apply the specific fix for this symptom: deduplicate the broken link list by target address, fix each unique link once, mark it verified in the saved list, and stop the run when the unverified count stops shrinking between passes. Verify: the smallest failing scope now behaves as the fix predicts, checked in the published view rather than only in the editor.
3. Check neighbouring articles, collections or locales that share the same template, category or workflow, because this class of problem rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Repeat the original reader or agent action in Article update agent that exposed the symptom, using the same query, link or workflow as the first attempt. Verify: the action completes and the original symptom does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth for this item, the current product behaviour, price list, release notes or ticket evidence named in the fix. Verify: the published result matches the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the scope it covered and the verification result where the content team works, so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the symptom, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

Agent loop repeating the same broken link list while updating an article after a UI change

The verbatim form readers and agents paste from the help center or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single scope proof, then the wider rollout.

How to fix - agent stuck loop detected repeating the same broken link list while trying to update an article after a UI change error failure

The how to phrasing for the same problem in Article update agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the final check.

Article update agent troubleshooting for this symptom

The symptom first phrasing used when the full message is hidden. Surface the full symptom first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

The agent rescans the article and regenerates the same list including links it already fixed, because scan results are not reconciled against the fix record between passes.

Edge cases

• The symptom appears in one locale, collection or audience view only. Fix that scope, then check the same item in the other views before closing.
• A cached or indexed copy keeps showing the old state after the fix. Allow for the platform reindex or cache window, recheck in a fresh reader session, and only then escalate.
• Two items have near identical titles. Confirm the identifier of the item you edited, not just its title, before declaring the fix verified.

Compatibility: Article update agent at current versions, plus the help center admin, search or API surface the query names; no extra tooling beyond reader level access to verify the published result.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstM2quwFkfWH3SFmvo8fLQw

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstM2quwFkfWH3SFmvo8fLQw

Thread query: agent stuck loop detected repeating the same broken link list while trying to update an article after a UI change error failure

TL;DR: Fix this in Article update agent by acting on the exact symptom first: deduplicate the broken link list by target address, fix each unique link once, mark it verified in the saved list, and stop the run when the unverified count stops shrinking between passes. Do not repeat the same edit, search or run unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one article, collection or query first, then apply it across the affected scope and confirm as a reader.