gold tasks graded wrong because benchmark answer uses old label name failure

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in the benchmark set by acting on the exact message first: update the gold answer to the current label name, version the benchmark so the change is visible, and regrade only the tasks that were scored against the old name. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

gold tasks graded wrong because benchmark answer uses old label name failure

Use this when

• The operation in the benchmark set fails with this exact message: gold tasks graded wrong because benchmark answer uses old label name failure.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A review, export or check is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is a permission or outage notice from the platform. Resolve that first, then return here if this error remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with its output. That is a quality review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in the benchmark set, and copy the full message plus the item, user or metric involved into the run notes. Verify: the error is reproduced on demand with a named item, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this error: update the gold answer to the current label name, version the benchmark so the change is visible, and regrade only the tasks that were scored against the old name. Verify: regraded tasks score against the current gold and pass rates return to the expected range.
3. Check the neighbouring items that share the same config, ontology, baseline or credential, because this class of failure rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in the benchmark set on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
5. Compare the result counts, decisions or alerts against the source in the benchmark set so a silent partial success is caught before sign off. Verify: counts match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the item so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the error, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

Gold tasks graded by exact label name fail every annotator once the ontology renames the label and the gold answer keeps the old name.

Variant phrasings

gold tasks graded wrong because benchmark answer uses old label name failure

The verbatim form searchers paste from the terminal or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single item proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix: gold tasks graded wrong because benchmark answer uses old label name failure

The how-to phrasing for the same failure in the benchmark set. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

the benchmark set troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom-first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Compatibility: the benchmark set at current versions, plus the platform API or console the query names; no extra tooling beyond a text editor and the source system access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst__cxOLUJDyxvpQfGsBlv2xg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst__cxOLUJDyxvpQfGsBlv2xg

Thread query: gold tasks graded wrong because benchmark answer uses old label name failure

TL;DR: Fix this in the benchmark set by acting on the exact message first: update the gold answer to the current label name, version the benchmark so the change is visible, and regrade only the tasks that were scored against the old name. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in Knowledge base by acting on the exact symptom first: update every saved view filter to the new tag name, keep the old tag as an alias during the transition if the platform allows it, and open each saved view to confirm it lists articles again. Do not repeat the same edit, search or run unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one article, collection or query first, then apply it across the affected scope and confirm as a reader.

Knowledge base tag rename breaks saved filtered article views for agents

Use this when

• Work in Knowledge base shows this exact symptom: Knowledge base tag rename breaks saved filtered article views for agents.
• The same symptom repeats after a retry with unchanged inputs.
• Readers or support agents are blocked until this item is corrected.

Not for this skill when

• The help center platform itself is down or returning outage notices. Resolve that first, then return here if this symptom remains.
• The content is correct and you only want a style or tone rewrite. That is an editorial pass, not this fix.

Steps

1. Reproduce the symptom with the smallest scope that still shows it in Knowledge base, and record the article, collection or query involved plus the exact wording from the code block above. Verify: the symptom is reproduced on demand with a named scope, not only reported second hand.
2. Apply the specific fix for this symptom: update every saved view filter to the new tag name, keep the old tag as an alias during the transition if the platform allows it, and open each saved view to confirm it lists articles again. Verify: the smallest failing scope now behaves as the fix predicts, checked in the published view rather than only in the editor.
3. Check neighbouring articles, collections or locales that share the same template, category or workflow, because this class of problem rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Repeat the original reader or agent action in Knowledge base that exposed the symptom, using the same query, link or workflow as the first attempt. Verify: the action completes and the original symptom does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth for this item, the current product behaviour, price list, release notes or ticket evidence named in the fix. Verify: the published result matches the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the scope it covered and the verification result where the content team works, so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the symptom, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

Knowledge base tag rename breaks saved filtered article views for agents

The verbatim form readers and agents paste from the help center or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single scope proof, then the wider rollout.

How to fix - knowledge base tag rename breaks saved filtered article views for agents

The how to phrasing for the same problem in Knowledge base. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the final check.

Knowledge base troubleshooting for this symptom

The symptom first phrasing used when the full message is hidden. Surface the full symptom first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

Saved views store the tag as literal text, so renaming the tag renamed the label but left every filter still looking for the old name and returning nothing.

Edge cases

• The symptom appears in one locale, collection or audience view only. Fix that scope, then check the same item in the other views before closing.
• A cached or indexed copy keeps showing the old state after the fix. Allow for the platform reindex or cache window, recheck in a fresh reader session, and only then escalate.
• Two items have near identical titles. Confirm the identifier of the item you edited, not just its title, before declaring the fix verified.

Compatibility: Knowledge base at current versions, plus the help center admin, search or API surface the query names; no extra tooling beyond reader level access to verify the published result.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_fqCAloUxocfTuJyVNAJzBg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_fqCAloUxocfTuJyVNAJzBg

Thread query: knowledge base tag rename breaks saved filtered article views for agents

TL;DR: Fix this in Knowledge base by acting on the exact symptom first: update every saved view filter to the new tag name, keep the old tag as an alias during the transition if the platform allows it, and open each saved view to confirm it lists articles again. Do not repeat the same edit, search or run unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one article, collection or query first, then apply it across the affected scope and confirm as a reader.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in Help center search by acting on the exact symptom first: build the synonym pair in the help center search settings for old name to new name, add the reverse pair too, and verify with the three most common old name queries from the search log. Do not repeat the same edit, search or run unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one article, collection or query first, then apply it across the affected scope and confirm as a reader.

Old feature name search returns no results after rename

Use this when

• Work in Help center search shows this exact symptom: Old feature name search returns no results after rename.
• The same symptom repeats after a retry with unchanged inputs.
• Readers or support agents are blocked until this item is corrected.

Not for this skill when

• The help center platform itself is down or returning outage notices. Resolve that first, then return here if this symptom remains.
• The content is correct and you only want a style or tone rewrite. That is an editorial pass, not this fix.

Steps

1. Reproduce the symptom with the smallest scope that still shows it in Help center search, and record the article, collection or query involved plus the exact wording from the code block above. Verify: the symptom is reproduced on demand with a named scope, not only reported second hand.
2. Apply the specific fix for this symptom: build the synonym pair in the help center search settings for old name to new name, add the reverse pair too, and verify with the three most common old name queries from the search log. Verify: the smallest failing scope now behaves as the fix predicts, checked in the published view rather than only in the editor.
3. Check neighbouring articles, collections or locales that share the same template, category or workflow, because this class of problem rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Repeat the original reader or agent action in Help center search that exposed the symptom, using the same query, link or workflow as the first attempt. Verify: the action completes and the original symptom does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth for this item, the current product behaviour, price list, release notes or ticket evidence named in the fix. Verify: the published result matches the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the scope it covered and the verification result where the content team works, so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the symptom, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

Old feature name search returns no results after rename

The verbatim form readers and agents paste from the help center or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single scope proof, then the wider rollout.

How to fix - how to fix help center search synonyms missing users searching old feature name find nothing fails error

The how to phrasing for the same problem in Help center search. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the final check.

Help center search troubleshooting for this symptom

The symptom first phrasing used when the full message is hidden. Surface the full symptom first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

Search treats the old and new names as unrelated terms after a rename, so only an explicit synonym mapping reconnects reader language to current content.

Edge cases

• The symptom appears in one locale, collection or audience view only. Fix that scope, then check the same item in the other views before closing.
• A cached or indexed copy keeps showing the old state after the fix. Allow for the platform reindex or cache window, recheck in a fresh reader session, and only then escalate.
• Two items have near identical titles. Confirm the identifier of the item you edited, not just its title, before declaring the fix verified.

Compatibility: Help center search at current versions, plus the help center admin, search or API surface the query names; no extra tooling beyond reader level access to verify the published result.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_b22G2a41iqXeqURA2GEuDw

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_b22G2a41iqXeqURA2GEuDw

Thread query: how to fix help center search synonyms missing users searching old feature name find nothing fails error

TL;DR: Fix this in Help center search by acting on the exact symptom first: build the synonym pair in the help center search settings for old name to new name, add the reverse pair too, and verify with the three most common old name queries from the search log. Do not repeat the same edit, search or run unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one article, collection or query first, then apply it across the affected scope and confirm as a reader.