agent hallucinated expansion signal claimed usage growth absent from ware

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in expansion signal agent workflow by acting on the exact message first: require every claimed expansion signal to cite the warehouse query result behind it, recompute the claimed growth figure from that result, reject any signal whose growth is absent from the warehouse rows, and log the rejected claim with its account for review. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one account, batch or record set first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

agent hallucinated expansion signal claimed usage growth absent from warehouse data

Use this when

• The operation in expansion signal agent workflow fails with this exact message or symptom: agent hallucinated expansion signal claimed usage growth absent from warehouse data.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• Expansion scoring, alerting or outreach is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is an outage notice from the platform. Resolve that first, then return here if this error remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with its output quality. That is a quality review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in expansion signal agent workflow, and copy the full message plus the account, signal or job involved into the run notes. Verify: the error is reproduced on demand with a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this error: require every claimed expansion signal to cite the warehouse query result behind it, recompute the claimed growth figure from that result, reject any signal whose growth is absent from the warehouse rows, and log the rejected claim with its account for review. Verify: the smallest failing scope now completes, or the named account, signal or job behaves as the fix predicts.
3. Check the neighbouring accounts, signals or jobs that share the same config, schema or source, because this class of failure rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in expansion signal agent workflow on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
5. Compare the result counts, scores or status against the source in expansion signal agent workflow so a silent partial success is caught before sign off. Verify: counts match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the item so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the error, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

An agent summarising from the task description instead of the returned rows can invent plausible growth, and source validation against the warehouse rows is the check that catches it.

Variant phrasings

agent hallucinated expansion signal claimed usage growth absent from warehouse data

The verbatim form searchers paste from the terminal or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single scope proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinated expansion signal claimed usage growth absent from warehouse data

The how-to phrasing for the same failure in expansion signal agent workflow. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

expansion signal agent workflow troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom-first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Edge cases

• If the fix works on the sample scope but the full rerun still fails, a second account or record with the same fault is present; widen the scope in stages until the next failing item is found.
• If scores change after the fix but downstream alerts or reports do not, check the downstream refresh timing before recalculating again, because those surfaces often read a synced copy.
• If the source information itself is missing for the affected accounts, record that as a source gap rather than scoring the accounts as zero.

Compatibility: expansion signal agent workflow at current versions, plus the platform API or console the query names; no extra tooling beyond the source system access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst__lD9x9ltu2xZ3JxdGBER4A

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst__lD9x9ltu2xZ3JxdGBER4A

Thread query: agent hallucinated expansion signal claimed usage growth absent from warehouse data

TL;DR: Fix this in expansion signal agent workflow by acting on the exact message first: require every claimed expansion signal to cite the warehouse query result behind it, recompute the claimed growth figure from that result, reject any signal whose growth is absent from the warehouse rows, and log the rejected claim with its account for review. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one account, batch or record set first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in Enrichment agent by acting on the exact message first: only report surge topics that appear as rows in the provider export for that company, join intent claims to the export by company domain, and remove every topic claim with no matching export row. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one record, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Agent invented intent data, it claimed Bombora surge topics absent from the provider export

Use this when

• The operation in Enrichment agent fails with this exact message: Agent invented intent data, it claimed Bombora surge topics absent from the provider export.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A run, import, export or alert is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is a permission or platform outage notice. Resolve that first, then return here if this error remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with its output. That is a quality review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in Enrichment agent, and copy the full message plus the record, account or list involved into the run notes. Verify: the error is reproduced on demand with a named record, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this error: only report surge topics that appear as rows in the provider export for that company, join intent claims to the export by company domain, and remove every topic claim with no matching export row. Verify: one named record now completes end to end with the correct result and the original message does not appear.
3. Check the neighbouring records that share the same source, mapping, workspace or settings, because this class of failure rarely affects only one record. Verify: the neighbouring records are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Compare the result counts, fields or alerts against the source in Enrichment agent so a silent partial success is caught before sign off. Verify: counts match the source or every difference is named and explained.
5. Rerun the original operation in Enrichment agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the error, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

Summarising intent from company context produces plausible topics, and without a row level check against the export those inventions read exactly like real signals.

Variant phrasings

Agent invented intent data, it claimed Bombora surge topics absent from the provider export

The verbatim form searchers paste from the terminal or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single record proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix this failure in Enrichment agent

The how to phrasing for the same failure. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

Troubleshooting this failure in Enrichment agent

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Compatibility: Enrichment agent at current versions, plus the platform API or console the query names; no extra tooling beyond the source system access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_eIBoNCcTdGxHJXdARQccBg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_eIBoNCcTdGxHJXdARQccBg

Thread query: agent hallucinated intent data claimed Bombora surge topics absent from provider export

TL;DR: Fix this in Enrichment agent by acting on the exact message first: only report surge topics that appear as rows in the provider export for that company, join intent claims to the export by company domain, and remove every topic claim with no matching export row. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one record, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in meeting prep agent by acting on the exact message first: require every funding claim in the brief to carry a news source link and date from the search results, delete any claim the agent cannot cite, and add a pre send check that lists uncited company claims for removal. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

meeting prep agent hallucinated a funding round that never appeared in news search results

Use this when

• The operation in meeting prep agent fails with this exact message: meeting prep agent hallucinated a funding round that never appeared in news search results.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A call, review or send is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is a permission or outage notice from the platform. Resolve that first, then return here if this error remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with its output. That is a quality review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in meeting prep agent, and copy the full message plus the account, contact or meeting involved into the run notes. Verify: the error is reproduced on demand with a named item, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this error: require every funding claim in the brief to carry a news source link and date from the search results, delete any claim the agent cannot cite, and add a pre send check that lists uncited company claims for removal. Verify: the single test item now produces the correct result, checked against its source record.
3. Check the neighbouring items that share the same template, integration, source or account, because this class of failure rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Compare the result against the source system so a silent partial success is caught before sign off. Verify: counts and key values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
5. Rerun the original operation in meeting prep agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the item so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the error, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

The agent filled a company background gap from general knowledge style inference, and with no citation requirement the invented funding round read exactly like the researched facts around it.

Variant phrasings

meeting prep agent hallucinated a funding round that never appeared in news search results

The verbatim form searchers paste from the terminal or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single item proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - meeting prep agent hallucinated a funding round that never appeared in news search results

The how-to phrasing for the same failure in meeting prep agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

Troubleshooting this failure in meeting prep agent

The symptom-first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Compatibility: meeting prep agent at current versions, plus the platform API or console the query names; no extra tooling beyond the source system access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstjqsQKAgxwxZgKyfFACTlg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstjqsQKAgxwxZgKyfFACTlg

Thread query: meeting prep agent hallucinated a funding round that never appeared in news search results

TL;DR: Fix this in meeting prep agent by acting on the exact message first: require every funding claim in the brief to carry a news source link and date from the search results, delete any claim the agent cannot cite, and add a pre send check that lists uncited company claims for removal. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.