test api health probe

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

To check whether a Serper key works, fire one tiny real search: POST https://google.serper.dev/search with X-API-KEY set and body {"q": "test", "num": 1}. A 200 with an organic array means the key is good.

Fix

1. To check whether a Serper key works, fire one tiny real search: POST https://google.serper.dev/search with X-API-KEY set and body {"q": "test", "num": 1}. Expected: You see the expected output instead of the problem.

When to use

• You are dealing with this situation.
• The symptom matches: Serper has no account-probe endpoint; validate keys with a minimal search.

When NOT to use

• Unrelated issues with a different cause.
• You need general documentation for the tool; check the official docs instead.

Compatibility

Reported per the linked source.

Variant phrasings

Serper has no account-probe endpoint; validate keys with a minimal search

Why it happens

Web (stackos api-keys.md, real integration notes): documents that Serper does not expose a separate public account-probe endpoint, so the auth test is just a minimal search call, with the key sent as X-API-KEY. Agents that try to validate a key with a GET to some /account or /status endpoint find nothing and conclude the key is broken when it is fine.

Edge cases

• If your error message differs even slightly, this is probably a different issue; search the exact text.
• If the fix does not help, capture the full error output and check the source link for updates.

Web (stackos api-keys.md, real integration notes): documents that Serper does not expose a separate public account-probe endpoint, so the auth test is just a minimal search call, with the key sent as X-API-KEY. Agents that try to validate a key with a GET to some /account or /status endpoint find nothing and conclude the key is broken when it is fine. Resolved: To check whether a Serper key works, fire one tiny real search: POST https://google.serper.dev/search with X-API-KEY set and body {"q": "test", "num": 1}. A 200 with an organic array means the key is good. A 401/403 means the key is wrong. Do not look for a dedicated key-validation endpoint; there is not one. Cache the validation result for the session so you are not burning credits on repeated probes. Source: https://github.com/flowmonkeyio/stackos/blob/HEAD/docs/api-keys.md

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in the agent connection to the compliance evidence API by doing this first: verify the API base address in the agent configuration, confirm the agent credential is accepted with one small read call, and fix whichever of address, credential, or network path fails that probe before rerunning the job. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

agent could not connect to the API

Use this when

• The operation fails with this exact problem: agent could not connect to the API.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• An audit, review, or request is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is a platform outage notice or a general sign-in failure. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with its output. That is a quality review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in the agent connection to the compliance evidence API, and copy the full message plus the item, account, or request involved into the run notes. Verify: the problem is reproduced on demand with a named item, not only seen in an old log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: verify the API base address in the agent configuration, confirm the agent credential is accepted with one small read call, and fix whichever of address, credential, or network path fails that probe before rerunning the job. Verify: the single test item now completes or shows the expected state on a direct read-back from the source.
3. Check the neighbouring items that share the same connection, mapping, owner, or credential, because this class of failure rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Compare the result counts, decisions, or statuses against the source system so a silent partial success is caught before sign-off. Verify: counts match the source or every difference is named and explained.
5. Rerun the original operation on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input, and the verification result on the item so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied, and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

One of the address, the credential, or the network path is wrong, and the job reports all three as the same connect failure, so nothing gets fixed by retrying.

Variant phrasings

agent couldn't access compliance evidence API error failed to connect failure

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console or ticket. Treat it identically: same fix, same single item proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix this failure in practice

The how-to phrasing for the same failure. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

Troubleshooting the symptom-first form

The phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Compatibility: Vanta, Drata, and Secureframe class compliance platforms at current versions, plus the source systems the query names; no extra tooling beyond the platform console or API access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstkyziuhKl12ci4Cp9-fBJA

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstkyziuhKl12ci4Cp9-fBJA

Thread query: agent couldn't access compliance evidence API error failed to connect failure

TL;DR: Fix this in the agent connection to the compliance evidence API by doing this first: verify the API base address in the agent configuration, confirm the agent credential is accepted with one small read call, and fix whichever of address, credential, or network path fails that probe before rerunning the job. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in the agent connection to the DSR fulfilment API by doing this first: verify the API base address in the agent configuration, confirm the agent credential is accepted with one small read call, and fix whichever of address, credential, or network path fails that probe before rerunning the job. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

agent could not connect to the API

Use this when

• The operation fails with this exact problem: agent could not connect to the API.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• An audit, review, or request is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is a platform outage notice or a general sign-in failure. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with its output. That is a quality review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in the agent connection to the DSR fulfilment API, and copy the full message plus the item, account, or request involved into the run notes. Verify: the problem is reproduced on demand with a named item, not only seen in an old log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: verify the API base address in the agent configuration, confirm the agent credential is accepted with one small read call, and fix whichever of address, credential, or network path fails that probe before rerunning the job. Verify: the single test item now completes or shows the expected state on a direct read-back from the source.
3. Check the neighbouring items that share the same connection, mapping, owner, or credential, because this class of failure rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Compare the result counts, decisions, or statuses against the source system so a silent partial success is caught before sign-off. Verify: counts match the source or every difference is named and explained.
5. Rerun the original operation on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input, and the verification result on the item so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied, and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

One of the address, the credential, or the network path is wrong, and the job reports all three as the same connect failure, so nothing gets fixed by retrying.

Variant phrasings

agent couldn't access DSR fulfilment API error failed to connect failure

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console or ticket. Treat it identically: same fix, same single item proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix this failure in practice

The how-to phrasing for the same failure. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

Troubleshooting the symptom-first form

The phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Compatibility: OneTrust, Transcend, DataGrail, and Securiti class privacy platforms at current versions, plus the source systems the query names; no extra tooling beyond the platform console or API access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_wvANjXH29SQUgCfQvGSVMg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_wvANjXH29SQUgCfQvGSVMg

Thread query: agent couldn't access DSR fulfilment API error failed to connect failure

TL;DR: Fix this in the agent connection to the DSR fulfilment API by doing this first: verify the API base address in the agent configuration, confirm the agent credential is accepted with one small read call, and fix whichever of address, credential, or network path fails that probe before rerunning the job. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.