agent failed to run sanctions screening on a new vendor error failure

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in sanctions screening agent by acting on the exact problem first: dedupe screening retries by vendor tax ID and legal name, allow one active screening per vendor, and when a retry is requested return the existing screening status instead of submitting again, with the retry attempts logged. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

agent loop detected repeatedly retrying run sanctions screening on a new vendor

Use this when

• The operation in sanctions screening agent fails with this exact problem: agent loop detected repeatedly retrying run sanctions screening on a new vendor.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A vendor onboarding, payment setup, screening or vendor record step is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor of the tool. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a commercial decision such as price or terms. That is a negotiation, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named vendor in sanctions screening agent and record the full problem text plus the vendor, supplier record or onboarding case involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: dedupe screening retries by vendor tax ID and legal name, allow one active screening per vendor, and when a retry is requested return the existing screening status instead of submitting again, with the retry attempts logged. Verify: the single failing vendor now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring vendors, supplier records or onboarding cases that share the same automation, template or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one vendor. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in sanctions screening agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the vendor master record, the signed tax form or the compliance document, so a silent partial success is caught. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the vendor record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent loop detected repeatedly retrying run sanctions screening on a new vendor

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, report or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single vendor proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent loop detected: repeatedly retrying run sanctions screening on a new vendor error failure loop

The how to phrasing for the same failure in sanctions screening agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

sanctions screening agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

Each retry submits a fresh screening that resets the wait, so the result the agent is waiting for never arrives, and returning the existing status breaks the cycle.

Edge cases

• The vendor was merged, renamed or given new banking details after the failing run started. Refresh the vendor state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single vendor proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other vendors. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared automation can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct value. The vendor master record governs identity and payment details, the signed tax document governs classification and withholding, and the compliance screening governs approval status; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: sanctions screening agent at current versions, plus the procurement, ERP or screening platform the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_pA49wWIpBuJ2EU1i1cOQMw

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_pA49wWIpBuJ2EU1i1cOQMw

Thread query: agent loop detected: repeatedly retrying run sanctions screening on a new vendor error failure loop

TL;DR: Fix this in sanctions screening agent by acting on the exact problem first: dedupe screening retries by vendor tax ID and legal name, allow one active screening per vendor, and when a retry is requested return the existing screening status instead of submitting again, with the retry attempts logged. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in sanctions screening agent by acting on the exact problem first: check for an existing screening reference for this vendor before submitting a new one, reuse that reference and read its status, and add a rule that a vendor with a screening in progress is never rescreened in the same run. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

agent stuck loop detected repeating the same step while trying to run sanctions screening on a new vendor

Use this when

• The operation in sanctions screening agent fails with this exact problem: agent stuck loop detected repeating the same step while trying to run sanctions screening on a new vendor.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A vendor onboarding, payment setup, screening or vendor record step is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor of the tool. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a commercial decision such as price or terms. That is a negotiation, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named vendor in sanctions screening agent and record the full problem text plus the vendor, supplier record or onboarding case involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: check for an existing screening reference for this vendor before submitting a new one, reuse that reference and read its status, and add a rule that a vendor with a screening in progress is never rescreened in the same run. Verify: the single failing vendor now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring vendors, supplier records or onboarding cases that share the same automation, template or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one vendor. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in sanctions screening agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the vendor master record, the signed tax form or the compliance document, so a silent partial success is caught. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the vendor record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent stuck loop detected repeating the same step while trying to run sanctions screening on a new vendor

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, report or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single vendor proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent stuck loop detected repeating the same step while trying to run sanctions screening on a new vendor error failure

The how to phrasing for the same failure in sanctions screening agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

sanctions screening agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

Resubmitting screening because the first result is not instant creates a second pending screening, whose existence then confuses the status check and drives further resubmissions.

Edge cases

• The vendor was merged, renamed or given new banking details after the failing run started. Refresh the vendor state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single vendor proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other vendors. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared automation can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct value. The vendor master record governs identity and payment details, the signed tax document governs classification and withholding, and the compliance screening governs approval status; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: sanctions screening agent at current versions, plus the procurement, ERP or screening platform the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst5FYFBuRn7W9Mcmqd4_ppA

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst5FYFBuRn7W9Mcmqd4_ppA

Thread query: agent stuck loop detected repeating the same step while trying to run sanctions screening on a new vendor error failure

TL;DR: Fix this in sanctions screening agent by acting on the exact problem first: check for an existing screening reference for this vendor before submitting a new one, reuse that reference and read its status, and add a rule that a vendor with a screening in progress is never rescreened in the same run. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in sanctions screening agent by acting on the exact problem first: report the screening outcome only from the screening service response for this vendor, quote its status and reference in the vendor record, and block any summary that names a clearance or a match the response does not contain. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

agent hallucinating figures not in source data for run sanctions screening on a new vendor

Use this when

• The operation in sanctions screening agent fails with this exact problem: agent hallucinating figures not in source data for run sanctions screening on a new vendor.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A vendor onboarding, payment setup, screening or vendor record step is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor of the tool. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with a commercial decision such as price or terms. That is a negotiation, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named vendor in sanctions screening agent and record the full problem text plus the vendor, supplier record or onboarding case involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: report the screening outcome only from the screening service response for this vendor, quote its status and reference in the vendor record, and block any summary that names a clearance or a match the response does not contain. Verify: the single failing vendor now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring vendors, supplier records or onboarding cases that share the same automation, template or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one vendor. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in sanctions screening agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the vendor master record, the signed tax form or the compliance document, so a silent partial success is caught. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the vendor record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent hallucinating figures not in source data for run sanctions screening on a new vendor

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, report or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single vendor proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinating figures not in source data for run sanctions screening on a new vendor error hallucination failure

The how to phrasing for the same failure in sanctions screening agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

sanctions screening agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

Screening outcomes are binary compliance facts, and an agent that infers a likely clearance from a clean looking name invents the one fact the whole step exists to prove.

Edge cases

• The vendor was merged, renamed or given new banking details after the failing run started. Refresh the vendor state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single vendor proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other vendors. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared automation can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct value. The vendor master record governs identity and payment details, the signed tax document governs classification and withholding, and the compliance screening governs approval status; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: sanctions screening agent at current versions, plus the procurement, ERP or screening platform the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/psttRvvuwYAI5pLsRxyeDjjg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/psttRvvuwYAI5pLsRxyeDjjg

Thread query: agent hallucinating figures not in source data for run sanctions screening on a new vendor error hallucination failure

TL;DR: Fix this in sanctions screening agent by acting on the exact problem first: report the screening outcome only from the screening service response for this vendor, quote its status and reference in the vendor record, and block any summary that names a clearance or a match the response does not contain. Do not rerun the whole workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one vendor first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.