agent loop detected: repeating the same expansion task to build a whit

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in the proposal generator by acting on the exact message first: fingerprint every attempt at the task, build a customer proposal from a Salesforce opportunity, from its inputs plus its last result, stop after two identical fingerprints, and change one thing before retrying, a different source, a narrower query or a human check, recording the repeated action in the run log so the loop is visible. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Agent loop detected: repeating the same proposal task to build a customer proposal from a Salesforce opportunity error loop

Use this when

• The operation in the proposal generator fails with this exact message: Agent loop detected: repeating the same proposal task to build a customer proposal from a Salesforce opportunity error loop.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A call, review or send is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is a permission or outage notice from the platform. Resolve that first, then return here if this error remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with its output. That is a quality review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in the proposal generator, and copy the full message plus the account, contact, quote or meeting involved into the run notes. Verify: the error is reproduced on demand with a named item, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this error: fingerprint every attempt at the task, build a customer proposal from a Salesforce opportunity, from its inputs plus its last result, stop after two identical fingerprints, and change one thing before retrying, a different source, a narrower query or a human check, recording the repeated action in the run log so the loop is visible. Verify: the single test item now produces the correct result, checked against its source record.
3. Check the neighbouring items that share the same template, integration, pricebook, source or account, because this class of failure rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Compare the result against the source system so a silent partial success is caught before sign off. Verify: counts and key values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
5. Rerun the original operation in the proposal generator on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the item so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the error, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

The agent retried build a customer proposal from a Salesforce opportunity with unchanged inputs after a result it did not recognise as success, so each attempt reproduced the same state and the loop detector tripped.

Variant phrasings

Agent loop detected: repeating the same proposal task to build a customer proposal from a Salesforce opportunity error loop

The verbatim form searchers paste from the terminal or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single item proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix: agent loop detected: repeating the same proposal task to build a customer proposal from a Salesforce opportunity error loop failure

The how-to phrasing for the same failure in the proposal generator. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

Troubleshooting this failure in the proposal generator

The symptom-first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Compatibility: the proposal generator at current versions, plus the platform API or console the query names; no extra tooling beyond the source system access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstx8nCbacxNp6NwoKBuTO2w

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstx8nCbacxNp6NwoKBuTO2w

Thread query: agent loop detected: repeating the same proposal task to build a customer proposal from a Salesforce opportunity error loop failure

TL;DR: Fix this in the proposal generator by acting on the exact message first: fingerprint every attempt at the task, build a customer proposal from a Salesforce opportunity, from its inputs plus its last result, stop after two identical fingerprints, and change one thing before retrying, a different source, a narrower query or a human check, recording the repeated action in the run log so the loop is visible. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in the meeting prep briefer by acting on the exact message first: fingerprint every attempt at the task, build a renewal prep brief from usage data, from its inputs plus its last result, stop after two identical fingerprints, and change one thing before retrying, a different source, a narrower query or a human check, recording the repeated action in the run log so the loop is visible. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Agent loop detected: repeating the same meeting prep task to build a renewal prep brief from usage data error loop

Use this when

• The operation in the meeting prep briefer fails with this exact message: Agent loop detected: repeating the same meeting prep task to build a renewal prep brief from usage data error loop.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A call, review or send is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is a permission or outage notice from the platform. Resolve that first, then return here if this error remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with its output. That is a quality review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in the meeting prep briefer, and copy the full message plus the account, contact, quote or meeting involved into the run notes. Verify: the error is reproduced on demand with a named item, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this error: fingerprint every attempt at the task, build a renewal prep brief from usage data, from its inputs plus its last result, stop after two identical fingerprints, and change one thing before retrying, a different source, a narrower query or a human check, recording the repeated action in the run log so the loop is visible. Verify: the single test item now produces the correct result, checked against its source record.
3. Check the neighbouring items that share the same template, integration, pricebook, source or account, because this class of failure rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Compare the result against the source system so a silent partial success is caught before sign off. Verify: counts and key values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
5. Rerun the original operation in the meeting prep briefer on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the item so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the error, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

The agent retried build a renewal prep brief from usage data with unchanged inputs after a result it did not recognise as success, so each attempt reproduced the same state and the loop detector tripped.

Variant phrasings

Agent loop detected: repeating the same meeting prep task to build a renewal prep brief from usage data error loop

The verbatim form searchers paste from the terminal or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single item proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix: agent loop detected: repeating the same meeting prep task to build a renewal prep brief from usage data error loop failure

The how-to phrasing for the same failure in the meeting prep briefer. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

Troubleshooting this failure in the meeting prep briefer

The symptom-first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Compatibility: the meeting prep briefer at current versions, plus the platform API or console the query names; no extra tooling beyond the source system access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_u4NomMVdLbhMdJ53nsjw7Q

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_u4NomMVdLbhMdJ53nsjw7Q

Thread query: agent loop detected: repeating the same meeting prep task to build a renewal prep brief from usage data error loop failure

TL;DR: Fix this in the meeting prep briefer by acting on the exact message first: fingerprint every attempt at the task, build a renewal prep brief from usage data, from its inputs plus its last result, stop after two identical fingerprints, and change one thing before retrying, a different source, a narrower query or a human check, recording the repeated action in the run log so the loop is visible. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one item, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Stop the loop by making repetition visible and expensive. Log a hash of the step inputs and the tool result, abort when the same call repeats with the same result beyond a small budget, and require the agent to read back the Metabase state before attempting the step again. Loops during pull Metabase query results almost always mean a success signal the agent cannot see, so it retries a step that already worked or can never work.

agent loop detected: agent kept repeating the same pull Metabase query results step and failed with error

Use this when

• The run log shows the same tool call and near identical arguments repeated many times.
• The Metabase content shows repeated partial attempts or many duplicate objects from one run.
• The run ends by budget exhaustion rather than by a step error.

Not for this skill when

• The agent is slow but each step differs and progress is visible. That is a performance problem, not a loop.
• The agent failed once on a clear API error and stopped. Handle that error directly.

Steps

1. Freeze the run and extract its tool call sequence, counting repeats of the pull Metabase query results step and comparing their arguments. Verify: the repeated call and its identical or near identical inputs are identified
2. Inspect the Metabase state the step was trying to change and compare it with what the agent believed, using the API to read the current card and dashboard definitions plus the query result payloads. Verify: you can state whether the step had already succeeded, was failing permanently, or was aimed at the wrong target
3. Fix the root mismatch, such as pointing verification at the object the build actually creates, or teaching the step to treat an already exists result as success. Verify: a single manual pass of the step now reports success correctly
4. Add a repetition guard to the agent, hashing each tool call with its result and stopping the run after a small number of identical repeats with a clear loop error. Verify: a test run with a forced failure stops at the guard instead of exhausting its budget
5. Add a per step attempt budget and a run level step budget sized for the dashboard build, with the budget breach reported as its own failure type. Verify: the run summary separates loop aborts from ordinary step failures
6. Rerun the full pull Metabase query results task and confirm the agent completes in a normal step count. Verify: the run finishes and the dashboard opens in Metabase

Why it happens

Loops are a state recognition failure. The agent acts, the world changes or refuses to change, and the agent cannot tell the difference from its observations, so its planner rationally chooses the same action again. Retries feel safe to a planner because they are reversible, which is exactly why an external guard has to count them. Progress detection, where each step must change an observable state marker, is the general fix across agent frameworks.

Dashboard building agents plan, call the Metabase API, observe the result, and plan again. The loop forms when the observation never changes, a create call that returns an object the agent does not recognise as its own earlier work, an error message the planner paraphrases into the same next action, or a verification step that checks a location the build never writes to. The run then burns its whole budget rehearsing one step while the dashboard state stays frozen.

Operational notes for loop failures in agent pipelines. Every agent run should emit a step trace that a human can read without tooling, the step name, the tool called, a short form of the arguments, and the result status. Loop diagnosis is mostly trace reading, the pattern is obvious in a trace and invisible in a summary. Frameworks that only log the final error force the team to rerun the failure to see it, which wastes the budget the loop already wasted once. Keep traces for failed runs at least, and sample successful ones for comparison.

Variants and edge cases

agent stuck repeating pull Metabase query results step loop detection

The detection phrasing for runaway repetition in the logs.

agent loop same tool call no progress abort budget

The guard design variant focused on budgets and hashing.

agent retries step that already succeeded Metabase state check

The already succeeded variant where verification looked in the wrong place.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_9x45jJjcTHrkrFQmjicZlQ

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_9x45jJjcTHrkrFQmjicZlQ

Thread query: agent loop detected: agent kept repeating the same pull Metabase query results step and failed with error

TL;DR: Stop the loop by making repetition visible and expensive. Log a hash of the step inputs and the tool result, abort when the same call repeats with the same result beyond a small budget, and require the agent to read back the Metabase state before attempting the step again. Loops during pull Metabase query results almost always mean a success signal the agent cannot see, so it retries a step that already worked or can never work.