fixed in mistralai 1 5 2

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in Help center translations by acting on the exact symptom first: trigger or perform a targeted translation update for the changed paragraphs only, compare the English diff against the Spanish text paragraph by paragraph, and republish the locale version once the changed warning, step or price matches the source. Do not repeat the same edit, search or run unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one article, collection or query first, then apply it across the affected scope and confirm as a reader.

Translated article outdated after English article was fixed

Use this when

• Work in Help center translations shows this exact symptom: Translated article outdated after English article was fixed.
• The same symptom repeats after a retry with unchanged inputs.
• Readers or support agents are blocked until this item is corrected.

Not for this skill when

• The help center platform itself is down or returning outage notices. Resolve that first, then return here if this symptom remains.
• The content is correct and you only want a style or tone rewrite. That is an editorial pass, not this fix.

Steps

1. Reproduce the symptom with the smallest scope that still shows it in Help center translations, and record the article, collection or query involved plus the exact wording from the code block above. Verify: the symptom is reproduced on demand with a named scope, not only reported second hand.
2. Apply the specific fix for this symptom: trigger or perform a targeted translation update for the changed paragraphs only, compare the English diff against the Spanish text paragraph by paragraph, and republish the locale version once the changed warning, step or price matches the source. Verify: the smallest failing scope now behaves as the fix predicts, checked in the published view rather than only in the editor.
3. Check neighbouring articles, collections or locales that share the same template, category or workflow, because this class of problem rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Repeat the original reader or agent action in Help center translations that exposed the symptom, using the same query, link or workflow as the first attempt. Verify: the action completes and the original symptom does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth for this item, the current product behaviour, price list, release notes or ticket evidence named in the fix. Verify: the published result matches the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the scope it covered and the verification result where the content team works, so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the symptom, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

Translated article outdated after English article was fixed

The verbatim form readers and agents paste from the help center or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single scope proof, then the wider rollout.

How to fix - how to fix help center translation outdated English fix not reflected in Spanish article fails error

The how to phrasing for the same problem in Help center translations. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the final check.

Help center translations troubleshooting for this symptom

The symptom first phrasing used when the full message is hidden. Surface the full symptom first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

Translation workflows trigger on new articles but often miss edits to existing ones, so a small English fix leaves every locale version silently outdated.

Edge cases

• The symptom appears in one locale, collection or audience view only. Fix that scope, then check the same item in the other views before closing.
• A cached or indexed copy keeps showing the old state after the fix. Allow for the platform reindex or cache window, recheck in a fresh reader session, and only then escalate.
• Two items have near identical titles. Confirm the identifier of the item you edited, not just its title, before declaring the fix verified.

Compatibility: Help center translations at current versions, plus the help center admin, search or API surface the query names; no extra tooling beyond reader level access to verify the published result.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_LGYn0wdlqkLs3Hifq9nGYg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_LGYn0wdlqkLs3Hifq9nGYg

Thread query: how to fix help center translation outdated English fix not reflected in Spanish article fails error

TL;DR: Fix this in Help center translations by acting on the exact symptom first: trigger or perform a targeted translation update for the changed paragraphs only, compare the English diff against the Spanish text paragraph by paragraph, and republish the locale version once the changed warning, step or price matches the source. Do not repeat the same edit, search or run unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one article, collection or query first, then apply it across the affected scope and confirm as a reader.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Empty results on valid queries mean the query and the documents use different words: synonyms, typos, product jargon, or phrasing the articles never use. Expand the query automatically with synonyms and typo tolerance, fall back to broader searches when the precise one fails, and never show a bare "no results" page. The agent should search like a helpful librarian, not a literal string matcher.

The query

kb search agent returning empty results for valid queries: fallback query expansion

Use this when

• Search returns nothing for queries the KB covers
• Users rephrase and then find results
• You are tuning KB search recall
• Auditing search agent quality

Not for

• Building the search index
• Tuning result ranking order
• Writing KB articles
• Search analytics dashboards

Steps

1. Confirm the content exists with a known-good query

Search the exact article title. If even that returns nothing, the problem is indexing or permissions, not the query. If the title works but natural phrasing fails, it is a vocabulary gap.

Expected output: index versus vocabulary problem identified.

2. Add typo tolerance and normalization

Typos, plurals, and case differences should not zero out results. Normalize case, stem words, and allow small edit distances. Most empty-result queries are one typo away from results.

Expected output: typo'd queries returning the right articles.

3. Expand with synonyms automatically

Maintain a synonym map for your domain: "bill" and "invoice," "login" and "sign in," product codenames and public names. Expand the query with synonyms before giving up. Log which expansions fire to grow the map.

Expected output: synonym-expanded queries finding covered content.

4. Fall back progressively broader

If the precise query fails, retry automatically: fewer terms, then category browse, then "related articles." Each fallback is a wider net. Show the user what you tried so they can refine rather than retype.

Expected output: a fallback chain that rarely ends empty.

5. Track zero-result queries as content signal

Every query that survives all fallbacks with nothing is either a vocabulary gap to add to the synonym map or a content gap to write an article for. Review weekly. Zero-result queries are free user research.

Expected output: a weekly review turning zero-result queries into synonyms or articles.

Template: the checklist

KB search empty results:
[ ] Content confirmed indexed via known-good query
[ ] Typo tolerance and normalization in place
[ ] Domain synonym map expanding queries
[ ] Progressive fallback: precise, broad, browse, related
[ ] Zero-result queries reviewed weekly

Variant phrasings

kb search no results but article exists

Steps 1 and 2. Confirm indexing, then fix the query side.

search query expansion support kb

Steps 3 and 4. Synonyms plus fallback chain.

improving kb search recall

Steps 2 through 5 as the recall program.

Why it happens

Authors write articles in product vocabulary; users search in problem vocabulary. "Invoice discrepancy" versus "my bill is wrong" is the same question in two dialects. Literal matching only bridges the dialects by accident. Expansion and fallback are the deliberate bridge.

Edge cases

• Permission-filtered results: the article exists but the searcher cannot see it. Empty results are correct but confusing; say so.
• Multi-language KBs: expand within the query's language, and fall back across languages deliberately.
• New articles not yet indexed: index lag creates temporary zero-result windows. Mind the lag after publishing.
• Over-expansion: too-aggressive synonyms return irrelevant results, which is worse than none. Tune expansion precision.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstNbuk-mtD0JTNqown7WLXg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstNbuk-mtD0JTNqown7WLXg

Thread query: kb search agent returning empty results for valid queries: fallback query expansion

TL;DR: Empty results on valid queries mean the query and the documents use different words: synonyms, typos, product jargon, or phrasing the articles never use. Expand the query automatically with synonyms and typo tolerance, fall back to broader searches when the precise one fails, and never show a bare "no results" page. The agent should search like a helpful librarian, not a literal string matcher.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

The 422 means the goggles value is malformed, not that goggles are broken. A goggles parameter must be a valid goggles URL or a correctly formatted goggles definition, URL-encoded as a single parameter value. Test the query without goggles first, then re-add the parameter with exact encoding. If the goggles definition itself is invalid, the 422 will never clear until the definition is fixed.

brave search api 422 invalid goggles parameter

Use this when

• Adding goggles to a working query produces 422.
• The same goggles value fails on every query.
• You are passing a custom goggles definition inline.

Not for this skill when

• The query 422s without goggles. Then the problem is elsewhere in the request.
• The error is 401. That is the subscription key.

Steps

1. Remove the goggles parameter and rerun the exact query. Verify: 200 without goggles proves the parameter is the problem.
2. Check the goggles value format: it should be a full goggles URL (https scheme, reachable) or a valid definition string per the docs. Verify: the value matches the documented format exactly.
3. URL-encode the whole parameter value once, not twice. Double encoding is the most common cause. Verify: decoding your sent value once yields the clean goggles URL.
4. If using a hosted goggles URL, fetch it in a browser to confirm it loads. Verify: the URL is live and public.
5. If the definition is custom, validate it against the goggles spec line by line. Verify: a minimal valid definition passes, then build back up.

Variant phrasings

brave api goggles 422

The short search, same encoding diagnosis.

brave search goggles parameter invalid

Wording variant, points at step 2.

goggles url encoding brave api

Cause phrasing, lands on step 3.

Compatibility: Brave Search API with a Pro (AI) plan for goggles. The parameter is only valid on plans that include it.

Why it happens

Goggles are fetched and parsed server-side, so the API validates the parameter strictly. A truncated URL, a definition with a syntax error, or double encoding all fail validation with the same unhelpful 422. The API cannot tell you which of the three it is, so you bisect: no goggles, then encoded URL, then definition.

Edge cases / pitfalls

• Goggles require the paid plan tier. On a free key the parameter may 422 instead of 402. Check your plan.
• Some HTTP clients encode the parameter for you; encoding it yourself first double-encodes. Know your client.
• A goggles URL that requires login will 422. Goggles must be publicly fetchable.
• Cache the encoded value. Rebuilding it per request invites encoding drift.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstJ371JpvJcTT4CagJjPlEA

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstJ371JpvJcTT4CagJjPlEA

Thread query: brave search api 422 invalid goggles parameter

TL;DR: The 422 means the goggles value is malformed, not that goggles are broken. A goggles parameter must be a valid goggles URL or a correctly formatted goggles definition, URL-encoded as a single parameter value. Test the query without goggles first, then re-add the parameter with exact encoding. If the goggles definition itself is invalid, the 422 will never clear until the definition is fixed.