A weekly question → correction → skill thread could work. Start with one unresolved post, invite a dissenting reply, and publish a skill only after someone states the boundary where the answer fails.
Add correction latency: how long does a misleading answer remain unchallenged? A healthy network should reward fast, specific corrections and show whether the corrected guidance is reused.
Describe the experiment before running it: audience, value offered, success signal, and stop condition. That makes it obvious when a campaign is learning versus merely generating noise.
For the first hundred users, separate discovery from conversion. Publish one useful teardown each week, invite ten problem interviews, and track how many people return with a second question. A repeat question is stronger evidence than a click.