Rasgo feature failed error "feature computation SQL references dropped source table"
Repoint the feature computation SQL at the replacement table (or its renamed successor) and update any column names that changed with it, because the feature still references a source table that was dropped, so the computation fails before it reads a single row. Use when you see this exact failure: Rasgo feature failed error "feature computation SQL references dropped source table". Not for a vendor wide outage or a different error message.
TL;DR
Repoint the feature computation SQL at the replacement table (or its renamed successor) and update any column names that changed with it, because the feature still references a source table that was dropped, so the computation fails before it reads a single row. Start with the Rasgo feature SQL and the current source schema after the table drop, work on one affected call, record, or run first, and prove the fix there before running the full set. Most cases clear once the cause named in step 2 is corrected at its source rather than retried unchanged.
Rasgo feature failed error "feature computation SQL references dropped source table"Use this when
- You see this exact message or symptom: Rasgo feature failed error "feature computation SQL references dropped source table"
- One run, record, call, or object is affected and you can name it
- A retry without changing anything reproduces the same result
Not for this skill when
- The system fails with a different message and none of the signals here appear
- Nothing has failed yet and you are doing first time setup or general planning
- Every service from this vendor is down for all users, which is a vendor outage to wait out first
Steps
- Reproduce the failure once using the Rasgo feature SQL and the current source schema after the table drop, and record the time, the workspace or account, and the one item it names. Verify: you have one failing item identified, not a similar older failure
- Inspect the table named in the SQL, what replaced it in the warehouse, and column differences between the old and new tables. Verify: you can point to the specific value, field, segment, or state that does not match what this operation needs
- Apply the fix at that source: Repoint the feature computation SQL at the replacement table (or its renamed successor) and update any column names that changed with it, because the feature still references a source table that was dropped, so the computation fails before it reads a single row. Verify: the corrected value or setting is visible in the system itself, not only in a local file or the agent notes
- Re-run the original operation on the single affected item first. Verify: that one item completes with no trace of the failure described above, and the online and offline values for that entity agree
- Check the downstream result a user or the next job would see, comparing it against the source for the same item. Verify: the downstream result agrees with the source in content and in timing
- Repeat for the full set, watch the first few items in the same log you started from, and write the root cause and the changed setting into the run notes. Verify: the full run finishes, the notes name the failure and the fix, and no earlier item regressed
Variant phrasings
Rasgo feature failed error "feature computation SQL references dropped source table"
The subject-first phrasing of the same failure. The fix is the same, start at step 1 and confirm the item the log or record names.
Tool-first phrasing of this failure
The phrasing searchers use once they know which system raised it. It is the same underlying problem, not a separate bug.
Why does this keep happening after a retry
The repeat-occurrence phrasing. A retry without the step 2 and step 3 checks almost always reproduces it, because the cause sits in the input, setting, or record state, not in the attempt.
Compatibility: Rasgo features on warehouse sources, SQL defined feature computations.
Why it happens
Warehouse cleanups drop tables that features silently depend on. The feature definition is often the last place updated because nothing warns until the computation actually runs.
Provenance
Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstemsQnxNibJD2HEU3B7vNQ