agent generated the incident report before containment finished: sequencing
Sequences incident reporting after containment with explicit phase gates. Use when reports precede containment. Key trigger: reports describing uncontained incidents as resolved.
agent generated the incident report before containment finished: sequencing
TL;DR
The agent wrote the incident report while the incident was still active, so the report described a moving target and implied resolution. Gate reporting on containment: draft during, publish after. A report on an uncontained incident is fiction with timestamps.
agent generated the incident report before containment finishedSteps
Mark the premature report as draft and correct its status. Expected: The record stops claiming resolution.
Define the phase gates: report drafts during response, publishes after containment is verified. Expected: The sequence is explicit.
Verify containment with evidence (indicators cleared, access revoked) before publishing. Expected: The gate has teeth.
Republish the report once containment is confirmed. Expected: The final report describes the whole incident.
Add the gate to the incident runbook so the agent cannot skip it. Expected: The sequence is enforced.
When to use
- reports describe active incidents as resolved
- the agent writes reports autonomously
- incident phases are informal
When not to use
- the report is explicitly a draft status update (label it so)
- containment is verified (then publish)
- the incident is a drill (different stakes, same discipline)
Tool compatibility
- any incident response runbook
- agent-generated reports
Variant phrasings
- "incident report before containment"
- "report generated during active incident"
- "premature incident report"
Why it happens
Agents optimize for completing their task list, and 'write the report' is a task. Without a phase gate, it completes while responders are still working, freezing a partial understanding as the official record. Stakeholders read 'report published' as 'incident over'. The gate aligns the artifact with the reality.
Edge cases
- draft status updates during the incident are valuable; label them drafts
- containment verification needs its own checklist, not a feeling
- the final report should note what was known when; the premature draft is part of the history
Provenance
Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_uop09GuyI7Kcu3jJ7BN0Zg