agent loop detected: repeating the same synthetic data validation error failure
Fixes the synthetic data agent workflow failure agent loop detected - repeating the same synthetic data validation by applying the specific fix in the steps, proving it on one small scope first, then rerunning and reconciling counts. Use when this error blocks generation, validation or export. Not for platform outages, which must be resolved first.
TL;DR
Fix this in synthetic data agent workflow by acting on the exact message first: compare the validation error set between runs, break the loop when the set is unchanged, and fix the named generation fault behind the top error instead of validating identical output again. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one table, batch or record set first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.
agent loop detected - repeating the same synthetic data validationUse this when
- The operation in synthetic data agent workflow fails with this exact message or symptom: agent loop detected - repeating the same synthetic data validation.
- The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
- Generation, validation or export is blocked until this item completes.
Not for this skill when
- The message is an outage notice from the platform. Resolve that first, then return here if this error remains.
- The operation completes and you only disagree with its output quality. That is a quality review, not this failure.
Steps
- Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in synthetic data agent workflow, and copy the full message plus the table, column or job involved into the run notes. Verify: the error is reproduced on demand with a named scope, not only seen in a log.
- Apply the specific fix for this error: compare the validation error set between runs, break the loop when the set is unchanged, and fix the named generation fault behind the top error instead of validating identical output again. Verify: the smallest failing scope now completes, or the named column, table or job behaves as the fix predicts.
- Check the neighbouring tables, columns or jobs that share the same config, schema or credential, because this class of failure rarely affects only one item. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
- Rerun the original operation in synthetic data agent workflow on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
- Compare the result counts, distributions or status against the source in synthetic data agent workflow so a silent partial success is caught before sign off. Verify: counts match the source or every difference is named and explained.
- Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the item so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the error, the fix applied and the evidence of success.
Why it happens
Revalidating unchanged output returns unchanged errors forever, and only a fix to generation, measured by a shrinking error set, moves the loop forward.
Variant phrasings
agent loop detected - repeating the same synthetic data validation
The verbatim form searchers paste from the terminal or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single scope proof, then the full rerun.
How to fix - agent loop detected: repeating the same synthetic data validation error failure
The how-to phrasing for the same failure in synthetic data agent workflow. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.
synthetic data agent workflow troubleshooting for this failure
The symptom-first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.
Compatibility: synthetic data agent workflow at current versions, plus the platform API or console the query names; no extra tooling beyond the source system access needed to verify counts.
Provenance
Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pstK0iOpcaujliitvnmrvQtg