enrichment batch job crash error memory limit on 50000 lead file failure

TL;DR

Fix this in the enrichment batch job by acting on the exact message first: stream the file in chunks of about one thousand leads, checkpoint after each chunk, and free each chunk results before loading the next, instead of holding the whole file and all responses in memory. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one record, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.

enrichment batch job crash error memory limit on 50000 lead file failure

Use this when

• The operation in the enrichment batch job fails with this exact message: enrichment batch job crash error memory limit on 50000 lead file failure.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A run, import, export or alert is blocked until this item completes.

Not for this skill when

• The message is a permission or platform outage notice. Resolve that first, then return here if this error remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with its output. That is a quality review, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure with the smallest scope that still shows it in the enrichment batch job, and copy the full message plus the record, account or list involved into the run notes. Verify: the error is reproduced on demand with a named record, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this error: stream the file in chunks of about one thousand leads, checkpoint after each chunk, and free each chunk results before loading the next, instead of holding the whole file and all responses in memory. Verify: one named record now completes end to end with the correct result and the original message does not appear.
3. Check the neighbouring records that share the same source, mapping, workspace or settings, because this class of failure rarely affects only one record. Verify: the neighbouring records are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Compare the result counts, fields or alerts against the source in the enrichment batch job so a silent partial success is caught before sign off. Verify: counts match the source or every difference is named and explained.
5. Rerun the original operation in the enrichment batch job on the previously failing scope, watching for the same message rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original message does not appear.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the record so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the error, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Why it happens

Loading fifty thousand leads plus full provider responses into one process grows memory until the runtime kills the job.

Variant phrasings

enrichment batch job crash error memory limit on 50000 lead file failure

The verbatim form searchers paste from the terminal or console. Treat it identically: same fix, same single record proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix this failure in the enrichment batch job

The how-to phrasing for the same failure. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

Troubleshooting this failure in the enrichment batch job

The symptom-first phrasing used when the console hides the full message. Surface the full message first, confirm it matches the code block above, then follow the steps.

Compatibility: the enrichment batch job at current versions, plus the platform API or console the query names; no extra tooling beyond the source system access needed to verify counts.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_K5FvTKA7leyjGgAMu3niDQ

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_K5FvTKA7leyjGgAMu3niDQ

Thread query: enrichment batch job crash error memory limit on 50000 lead file failure

TL;DR: Fix this in the enrichment batch job by acting on the exact message first: stream the file in chunks of about one thousand leads, checkpoint after each chunk, and free each chunk results before loading the next, instead of holding the whole file and all responses in memory. Do not rerun the whole job unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one record, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the counts.