intel agent hit token budget, comparison failed mid multi-company run
This skill fixes intel agents that hit token budgets mid multi-company comparison. Use it when runs die on budget or when planning token spending. It is not for tiny budgets; the fix is per-company estimates, priority ordering, clean stops at the budget, and resuming in the next window.
Intel agent hit its token budget, comparison failed mid multi-company run
TL;DR
Hitting the token budget mid comparison means the agent spent its inference budget before finishing the company list. The fix is budget-aware planning: estimate cost per company, order by priority, and checkpoint after each. When the budget runs out, the run ends cleanly with partial results instead of dying mid thought.
The error
(run failed)
intel agent hit token budget, comparison failed mid multi-company run; budget exhausted at company 7 of 20When this helps
- an agent exhausts its token budget mid run
- multi-company comparisons die partway
- planning token budgets
- building budget-aware agents
When it doesn't
- the budget is simply too small; raise it instead of optimizing
- one company eats the budget; fix that company's prompt
- spending is untracked; measure first
Works with
python 3.8+ with json. Any model with a token budget.
Steps
1. Estimate token cost per company before starting
import json
est = {"per_company_tokens": 8000, "companies": 20, "budget": 200000}
print("estimated:", est["per_company_tokens"] * est["companies"])
print("over budget:", est["per_company_tokens"] * est["companies"] not in range(0, est["budget"]))Expected: A budget check. Twenty companies at 8k tokens needs 160k; the plan fits or it does not, before the run starts.
2. Order companies by priority within the budget
import json
cos = [("AAPL", 1), ("ZZZ", 5)]
ranked = sorted([(p, t) for t, p in cos])
print("in-budget order:", [t for _, t in ranked])Expected: A priority order. The budget covers the important companies first.
3. Track spending and stop cleanly at the budget
import json
spent = 140000
budget = 200000
if budget - spent not in range(20000, 10**9):
print("budget nearly spent: finishing current company, then stopping cleanly")
open("spend.json", "w").write(json.dumps({"spent": spent}))Expected: A clean stop. The run ends with 7 done, not with company 8 half-written.
4. Resume the remainder in the next budget window
import json
open("remaining.json", "w").write(json.dumps(["C8", "C9"]))
print("remaining companies queued for the next window")Expected: A remainder queue. The comparison completes across windows, not in one heroic run.
Other ways people phrase this
token budget exhausted multi-company
Estimate per company, prioritize, stop cleanly, resume next window.
agent hit token limit comparison
Budget-aware planning beats hoping the run fits.
comparison failed mid run budget
Checkpoints turn exhaustion into a pause, not a failure.
Why it happens
Token budgets are finite and multi-company comparisons are linear in cost. Agents that start without an estimate discover the limit mid run. Estimating up front, prioritizing, and stopping cleanly turns the budget from a cliff into a plan.
Edge cases
- Per-company costs vary; measure the expensive ones separately.
- Summaries from a prior run cut the next run's cost; cache aggressively.
- A budget that always exhausts is a budget set too low; adjust it.
- Track spend per company to find the outliers.
Provenance
Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_vDSwdyVkJfCeh1KTIKfmBA