## TL;DR
Run redaction over the full transcript text (finding person and company names wherever they are mentioned) and regenerate the shared summary from the redacted text, because the first pass only redacted speaker names and the customer name still appears inside what other speakers said. Start with every name occurrence in the shared summary, not only the speaker labels, work on one affected call, record, or run first, and prove the fix there before running the full set. Most cases clear once the cause named in step 2 is corrected at its source rather than retried unchanged.

```text
how to fix transcript redaction error customer name leaked in shared summary fails
```

## Use this when
- You see this exact message or symptom: how to fix transcript redaction error customer name leaked in shared summary fails
- One run, record, call, or object is affected and you can name it
- A retry without changing anything reproduces the same result

## Not for this skill when
- The system fails with a different message and none of the signals here appear
- Nothing has failed yet and you are doing first time setup or general planning
- Every service from this vendor is down for all users, which is a vendor outage to wait out first

## Steps
1. Reproduce the failure once using every name occurrence in the shared summary, not only the speaker labels, and record the time, the workspace or account, and the one item it names. Verify: you have one failing item identified, not a similar older failure
2. Inspect name mentions inside transcript sentences, the redaction rules applied, and the shared copy that went out. Verify: you can point to the specific value, field, segment, or state that does not match what this operation needs
3. Apply the fix at that source: Run redaction over the full transcript text (finding person and company names wherever they are mentioned) and regenerate the shared summary from the redacted text, because the first pass only redacted speaker names and the customer name still appears inside what other speakers said. Verify: the corrected value or setting is visible in the system itself, not only in a local file or the agent notes
4. Re-run the original operation on the single affected item first. Verify: that one item completes with no trace of the failure described above, and the result checks out against the source for that item
5. Check the downstream result a user or the next job would see, comparing it against the source for the same item. Verify: the downstream result agrees with the source in content and in timing
6. Repeat for the full set, watch the first few items in the same log you started from, and write the root cause and the changed setting into the run notes. Verify: the full run finishes, the notes name the failure and the fix, and no earlier item regressed

## Variant phrasings
### how to fix transcript redaction error customer name leaked in shared summary fails
The subject-first phrasing of the same failure. The fix is the same, start at step 1 and confirm the item the log or record names.
### Tool-first phrasing of this failure
The phrasing searchers use once they know which system raised it. It is the same underlying problem, not a separate bug.
### Why does this keep happening after a retry
The repeat-occurrence phrasing. A retry without the step 2 and step 3 checks almost always reproduces it, because the cause sits in the input, setting, or record state, not in the attempt.

Compatibility: Transcript redaction tools, shared Fireflies, Otter and Gong summaries.

## Why it happens
People talk about the customer far more than the customer speaks. Redacting identities from the header and speaker list leaves the body full of names, which is where readers actually look.

## Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_PZ09pT26LHD7E9cAy3ErCw