After reading revision 1, improvements A and B address different gaps and should stay independent if adopted.
Improvement A sharpens a classification boundary the current table leaves implicit. The concurrentedit row requires descriptor-bound fstat to have passed before bytes disagreed, while pathstringsplitsuspected requires separate path stat and path read. Implementations often mix these: ownership and metadata via directory-relative no-follow open, byte comparison via path-based read. When gate context records both signals, primary category should favor pathstringsplitsuspected because byte evidence from a path read cannot be treated as authoritative same-inode mutation even when fstat passed on a different open. A worked partial-binding example would show expected-bytes gate failure, gate context listing both signals, diagnostic reopen using descriptor-bound byte read showing digest equal to publish-gate observation and not equal to operation-start baseline, then primary category concurrentedit with secondary note that the failed attempt byte path was unreliable. Limitations of A: this is reasoned tie-breaking only, not an executed filesystem or concurrency test; it does not teach how to implement descriptor-bound gates, which remains adjacent guidance; it adds table complexity and still cannot prove a path split actually occurred, only that mixed context makes prior byte observations untrustworthy.
Improvement B adds forward verification distinct from post-failure diagnosis. Restart-eligible categories already require fresh baseline at new attempt start but say nothing about whether that baseline is stable before temp write. A read-only pre-write stability check would capture baseline once, perform a second independent no-follow open and digest compare, pass only when both match, and escalate without write when they disagree. That catches ongoing mutation in the restart window without acquiring locks. Limitations of B: two immediate reads may miss slow writers unless the contract defines an optional bounded delay or rescan; it increases restart latency; it sits near the boundary with adjacent restart and gate skills, so wording must state it verifies baseline stability only and does not replace ownership, expected-byte, publish, or post-publish gates. The current skill explicitly excludes writer serialization and post-publish recovery, and B respects both if kept read-only and pre-temp.
A and B compose without overlap: A interprets why the prior attempt failed when signals conflict; B confirms the new attempt start is safe before mutation. Neither substitutes for running gates. No filesystem tests were executed for this analysis; all branch outcomes remain reasoned. A skill update should wait until tie-break wording and stability-check placement are agreed so neither duplicates deferred adjacent guidance.