agent hallucinating answers not in source data for verify access is close

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in access verification agent by acting on the exact problem first: require every closed claim to cite a retrieved record for that system showing the leaver absent or deactivated, recompute the open count from the retrieved records, and fail the verification when a claimed closure matches no retrieved record. Do not rerun the whole offboarding workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one departing employee first, then rerun the full scope and verify access, assets and records.

agent hallucinating answers not in source data for verify access is closed after exit error hallucination failure

Use this when

• The operation in access verification agent fails with this exact problem: agent hallucinating answers not in source data for verify access is closed after exit error hallucination failure.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• An exit checklist, access revocation, handover or equipment return is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with an employment decision such as the termination date set by HR or the severance terms. That is an HR and legal decision, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named departing employee in access verification agent and record the full problem text plus the employee, last day or checklist involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named employee, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: require every closed claim to cite a retrieved record for that system showing the leaver absent or deactivated, recompute the open count from the retrieved records, and fail the verification when a claimed closure matches no retrieved record. Verify: the single failing employee or checklist now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring employees, applications or checklist steps that share the same termination workflow, template or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one leaver. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in access verification agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the HR record for last day and status, the identity provider for account access, the payroll record for final pay or the asset inventory for equipment. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the offboarding checklist audit log so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent hallucinating answers not in source data for verify access is closed after exit error hallucination failure

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, checklist or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single employee proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinating answers not in source data for verify access is closed after exit error hallucination failure

The how to phrasing for the same failure in access verification agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

access verification agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

An agent summarising many checks can report a system as closed because it expected closure, not because it saw it, and citing the retrieved record per system is what makes the sign off trustworthy.

Edge cases

• The employee record was corrected, the last day moved or the exit was cancelled after the failing run started. Refresh the record state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single employee proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other employees. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared template or sync can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct state. The HR record governs last day and employment status, the identity provider governs account access, and the asset system governs equipment; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: access verification agent at current versions, plus the HR, identity, payroll or asset system the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_6YYxKpsaQxKNZoc94G91iw

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_6YYxKpsaQxKNZoc94G91iw

Thread query: agent hallucinating answers not in source data for verify access is closed after exit error hallucination failure

TL;DR: Fix this in access verification agent by acting on the exact problem first: require every closed claim to cite a retrieved record for that system showing the leaver absent or deactivated, recompute the open count from the retrieved records, and fail the verification when a claimed closure matches no retrieved record. Do not rerun the whole offboarding workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one departing employee first, then rerun the full scope and verify access, assets and records.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in handbook answer agent by acting on the exact problem first: constrain every answer to a handbook passage the agent retrieved, cite the page and section for each claim, compare each cited passage against the answer wording, and refuse to answer any part that no retrieved passage supports rather than filling the gap plausibly. Do not rerun the whole onboarding flow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one hire or one task first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

agent hallucinating answers not in source data for answer a new hire question from the handbook error hallucination failure

Use this when

• The operation in handbook answer agent fails with this exact problem: agent hallucinating answers not in source data for answer a new hire question from the handbook error hallucination failure.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• A new hire start, an onboarding task, a first day step or a first week plan is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with an HR policy call such as eligibility or a start date decision. That is a people team decision, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named hire or task in handbook answer agent and record the full problem text plus the hire, task or start date involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named scope, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: constrain every answer to a handbook passage the agent retrieved, cite the page and section for each claim, compare each cited passage against the answer wording, and refuse to answer any part that no retrieved passage supports rather than filling the gap plausibly. Verify: the single failing hire or task now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring hires, tasks or start dates that share the same template, checklist or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one hire. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in handbook answer agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the HRIS hire record, the signed offer or the current handbook page, so a silent partial success is caught. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the onboarding log so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent hallucinating answers not in source data for answer a new hire question from the handbook error hallucination failure

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, report or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single hire proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinating answers not in source data for answer a new hire question from the handbook error hallucination failure

The how to phrasing for the same failure in handbook answer agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

handbook answer agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

Asked for a policy answer with thin retrieval, an agent fills gaps with plausible wording that reads as policy, and passage level citation is the only check that separates handbook answers from invented ones.

Edge cases

• The hire record was edited, the start date moved or the manager changed after the failing run started. Refresh the hire state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single hire proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other hires. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared template or schedule can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct value. The HRIS hire record governs who the hire is and when they start, the signed offer governs terms, and the current handbook governs policy wording; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: handbook answer agent at current versions, plus the HRIS, handbook or onboarding tool the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_FMuWtkVlidIJdwoBCoGtDg

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst_FMuWtkVlidIJdwoBCoGtDg

Thread query: agent hallucinating answers not in source data for answer a new hire question from the handbook error hallucination failure

TL;DR: Fix this in handbook answer agent by acting on the exact problem first: constrain every answer to a handbook passage the agent retrieved, cite the page and section for each claim, compare each cited passage against the answer wording, and refuse to answer any part that no retrieved passage supports rather than filling the gap plausibly. Do not rerun the whole onboarding flow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one hire or one task first, then rerun the full scope and reconcile the results.

Not specified by the original author.

TL;DR

Fix this in app access revocation agent by acting on the exact problem first: require every revoked claim to cite an application record retrieved during the run, compare each cited application against the departing employee access list before marking it closed, and drop any application, username or status that appears in no retrieved record. Do not rerun the whole offboarding workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one departing employee first, then rerun the full scope and verify access, assets and records.

agent hallucinating answers not in source data for revoke app access for a departing employee error hallucination failure

Use this when

• The operation in app access revocation agent fails with this exact problem: agent hallucinating answers not in source data for revoke app access for a departing employee error hallucination failure.
• The same failure repeats on retry with unchanged inputs.
• An exit checklist, access revocation, handover or equipment return is blocked until this is resolved.

Not for this skill when

• The notice is a platform outage from the vendor. Resolve that first, then return here if this problem remains.
• The operation completes and you only disagree with an employment decision such as the termination date set by HR or the severance terms. That is an HR and legal decision, not this failure.

Steps

1. Reproduce the failure on one named departing employee in app access revocation agent and record the full problem text plus the employee, last day or checklist involved. Verify: the failure is reproduced on demand on a named employee, not only seen in a log.
2. Apply the specific fix for this problem: require every revoked claim to cite an application record retrieved during the run, compare each cited application against the departing employee access list before marking it closed, and drop any application, username or status that appears in no retrieved record. Verify: the single failing employee or checklist now behaves as the fix predicts, or the corrected value is visible on the record.
3. Check neighbouring employees, applications or checklist steps that share the same termination workflow, template or sync, because this class of failure rarely affects only one leaver. Verify: the neighbouring items are listed and each is marked affected or clear.
4. Rerun the original operation in app access revocation agent on the previously failing scope, watching for the same problem rather than assuming success from a quiet log. Verify: the operation completes and the original problem does not appear.
5. Compare the result against the source of truth, the HR record for last day and status, the identity provider for account access, the payroll record for final pay or the asset inventory for equipment. Verify: values match the source or every difference is named and explained.
6. Record the fix, the triggering input and the verification result on the offboarding checklist audit log so the next occurrence is recognised immediately. Verify: the record names the problem, the fix applied and the evidence of success.

Variant phrasings

agent hallucinating answers not in source data for revoke app access for a departing employee error hallucination failure

The verbatim form searchers paste from the console, checklist or run log. Treat it identically: same fix, same single employee proof, then the full rerun.

How to fix - agent hallucinating answers not in source data for revoke app access for a departing employee error hallucination failure

The how to phrasing for the same failure in app access revocation agent. The steps above apply unchanged; start at the reproduction step rather than skipping to the rerun.

app access revocation agent troubleshooting for this failure

The symptom first phrasing used when the console hides the full problem. Surface the full problem first, confirm it matches the text block above, then follow the steps.

Why it happens

When an application lookup returns empty or partial results, an agent can invent plausible sounding revocations, and a record level comparison is the only check that separates retrieved facts from invented ones.

Edge cases

• The employee record was corrected, the last day moved or the exit was cancelled after the failing run started. Refresh the record state and reapply the fix against the current values, not the values from the failed run.
• The single employee proof passes but the full rerun still fails on other employees. Treat each remaining failure as its own scope, because a shared template or sync can hide more than one cause.
• The source systems disagree on the correct state. The HR record governs last day and employment status, the identity provider governs account access, and the asset system governs equipment; record which source won and why.

Compatibility: app access revocation agent at current versions, plus the HR, identity, payroll or asset system the query names; no extra tooling beyond access to the source records needed to verify results.

Provenance

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst9E4WXadL82gTT20JWSA2w

Resolved from the public thread: https://vectle.com/posts/pst9E4WXadL82gTT20JWSA2w

Thread query: agent hallucinating answers not in source data for revoke app access for a departing employee error hallucination failure

TL;DR: Fix this in app access revocation agent by acting on the exact problem first: require every revoked claim to cite an application record retrieved during the run, compare each cited application against the departing employee access list before marking it closed, and drop any application, username or status that appears in no retrieved record. Do not rerun the whole offboarding workflow unchanged, because the same inputs produce the same failure. Prove the fix on one departing employee first, then rerun the full scope and verify access, assets and records.